bonk

bonk — CS2 Stats

DK76561197969160589[U:1:8894861]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,967Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,914Purple band · top ~16.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26464 of 54213 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbonkFACEITLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,914 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning62
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46504Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1
Aggression9.8
Utility4.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch6.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time525ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 9–3
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 26ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA26161062%0.03
nukeA22121055%0.00
mirageD2171433%-0.01
anubisB115645%0.01
ancientD103730%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.08
dust23030%0.00
debris1010%-0.06
cache110100%0.03
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

944Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
91.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo2050%1.5018.9
Inferno2050%1.2918.6
Ancient1937%1.1117.2
Mirage1331%0.9714.3
Anubis1118%1.1014.2
Nuke1164%1.1819.4
Overpass850%1.6920.9
Dust2333%1.3417.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
524msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
10.45HE damage / grenade
4.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5151% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.0520%30 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0126%30 Aug
mirage7–130.0615%28 Aug
ancient13–60.0124%28 Aug
inferno8–130.0228%28 Aug
nuke13–110.0126%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0114%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.069%19 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%19 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0418%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0016%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0112%19 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0214%18 Aug
inferno5–130.0428%18 Aug
debris5–9-0.064%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0523%16 Aug
ancient13–110.0332%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0133%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0315%13 Aug
nuke13–110.0123%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0316%13 Aug
cache13–110.0328%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0610%12 Aug
inferno13–60.0215%12 Aug
inferno13–60.0823%11 Aug
dust211–130.0222%11 Aug
mirage11–130.0429%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0418%9 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0115%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0027%6 Aug
anubis13–100.0111%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0123%4 Aug
inferno10–130.0228%4 Aug
nuke9–130.0328%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0220%2 Aug
ancient13–8-0.014%2 Aug
nuke8–80.0517%2 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0116%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0018%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0211%31 Jul
nuke9–13-0.1032%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0226%31 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0327%29 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0113%19 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0125%19 Jul
inferno13–80.0427%19 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0120%17 Jul
ancient15–150.0221%17 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0315%17 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0125%16 Jul
anubis13–20.0520%16 Jul
nuke7–90.0015%16 Jul
nuke16–120.0220%14 Jul
nuke13–30.1439%14 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0114%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0122%12 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0216%12 Jul
inferno13–10.0719%12 Jul
inferno13–70.0313%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0316%12 Jul
mirage12–160.0023%11 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0114%11 Jul
nuke13–90.0524%11 Jul
vertigo8–80.0519%8 Jul
nuke3–9-0.0718%8 Jul
overpass1–9-0.3420%8 Jul
inferno9–30.1925%8 Jul
inferno9–130.0923%6 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0631%6 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0322%5 Jul
overpass13–90.0219%4 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0518%4 Jul
inferno13–60.0115%4 Jul
anubis10–130.0412%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0318%1 Jul
nuke13–70.0621%1 Jul
anubis16–140.0519%29 Jun
inferno10–20.0428%29 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0329%29 Jun
nuke16–140.0515%28 Jun
overpass13–100.0324%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0224%28 Jun
nuke13–160.0425%25 Jun
dust211–13-0.0022%25 Jun
inferno13–110.0326%22 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0219%22 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0919%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0029%21 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0521%20 Jun
inferno6–130.0728%20 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0519%20 Jun
inferno9–70.1525%20 Jun
nuke2–9-0.1623%20 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0223%18 Jun
nuke16–12-0.0315%18 Jun
inferno13–110.0327%18 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0624%15 Jun
nuke13–70.0511%15 Jun
anubis13–70.0821%14 Jun
anubis11–130.0310%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →