ZuckerBlatt

ZuckerBlatt — CS2 Stats

76561197963160433[U:1:2894705]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

665Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,588Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5741 of 20359 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,023 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZuckerBlattFACEITLevel 8 · 2,023 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,588 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning52
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.5
Utility6.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.2
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time627ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — overpass 13–8
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C33141942%-0.01
infernoS1310377%-0.01
mirageC125742%-0.00
ancientC104640%-0.02
overpassS108280%-0.01
nukeA74357%-0.01
anubisD6060%-0.02
cacheB63350%0.00
train330100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,269Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21638%0.9017.0
Inferno1369%1.1218.6
Mirage850%0.9616.3
Train425%0.7213.5
Ancient333%0.9013.7
Anubis367%1.0522.0
Nuke367%0.9713.3
Cache20%0.489.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
618msReaction time
44.8%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
11.87HE damage / grenade
9.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.8522% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0317%28 Aug
inferno13–10.0414%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0633%28 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0126%4 Aug
cache5–13-0.0728%4 Aug
dust216–13-0.0127%4 Aug
inferno13–10.0728%2 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0228%31 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0325%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0129%31 Jul
dust216–140.0333%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0211%29 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0416%28 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0423%28 Jul
cache8–130.0530%26 Jul
dust29–130.0526%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0223%26 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0813%20 Jul
dust20–13-0.1128%14 Jul
anubis4–13-0.1016%13 Jul
dust23–13-0.0930%13 Jul
ancient13–50.0324%13 Jul
dust210–130.0135%12 Jul
cache13–100.0025%12 Jul
ancient13–110.0320%11 Jul
cache13–6-0.0027%11 Jul
dust213–10-0.0423%11 Jul
cache13–50.0729%10 Jul
dust213–90.0827%10 Jul
ancient15–150.0027%10 Jul
dust213–4-0.0343%10 Jul
cache11–13-0.0233%10 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0424%6 Jul
dust213–5-0.0124%6 Jul
nuke13–50.0026%5 Jul
dust27–130.0320%5 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0418%23 Jun
dust211–130.0118%23 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0316%23 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0516%13 Jun
overpass13–110.0120%13 Jun
mirage13–100.0223%13 Jun
dust27–13-0.0823%9 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0520%9 Jun
dust26–0-0.0136%4 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0242%4 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0120%27 May
dust213–70.0444%27 May
overpass13–80.1018%26 May
dust214–160.0523%3 Mar
nuke13–50.0817%27 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0320%27 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0212%26 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0517%25 Feb
dust27–130.0032%25 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0220%12 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0215%12 Feb
inferno13–110.0123%12 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0413%10 Feb
anubis8–130.0330%10 Feb
dust213–100.0125%10 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0216%9 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0222%9 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0322%7 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0731%7 Feb
dust213–30.0022%7 Feb
mirage10–130.0233%7 Feb
overpass13–110.0131%4 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0520%3 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0716%3 Feb
dust211–130.0123%31 Jan
dust28–130.0133%30 Jan
overpass13–90.0236%30 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0331%28 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0128%26 Jan
inferno13–50.0538%26 Jan
dust211–13-0.0428%25 Jan
dust213–10-0.0130%25 Jan
dust213–30.0529%29 Oct
dust211–13-0.0123%28 Oct
dust214–160.0320%27 Oct
nuke11–13-0.0138%27 Oct
inferno13–110.0129%27 Oct
mirage13–40.1020%27 Oct
train13–60.0033%25 Oct
dust28–13-0.0624%24 Oct
mirage13–9-0.0539%24 Oct
dust213–20.0152%24 Oct
train13–80.0625%24 Oct
ancient10–13-0.0421%24 Oct
mirage9–130.0022%22 Oct
ancient2–130.0033%22 Oct
dust28–13-0.0420%21 Oct
train13–11-0.0424%16 Oct
overpass13–8-0.0210%16 Oct
ancient5–13-0.0511%16 Oct
dust210–13-0.0325%27 Sept
overpass13–5-0.0225%27 Sept
dust216–13-0.0311%19 Sept
mirage14–160.0415%19 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →