Kalven — CS2 Stats

76561197960374774[U:1:109046]✓ No bans

2,885Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+51Tracked matches · now 2,885
+8.7ppWin rate · 37.9% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 6 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

33Days played since 2026-07-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKalvenFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning54
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43534Last 10043%Win rateLLWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time516ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 20 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 10 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 10 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C49212843%-0.01
infernoA138562%-0.00
mirageC104640%0.01
anubisA85363%-0.01
ancientD71614%0.01
cacheD62433%-0.01
overpass3030%0.05
vertigo2020%-0.02
train110100%-0.03
nuke110100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

349Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
82.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
40%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2326%0.8714.1
Anubis1662%0.9915.2
Inferno1275%1.2016.1
Ancient1164%1.2316.4
Overpass862%1.0816.8
Vertigo875%1.1213.8
Nuke875%1.1217.9
Dust2425%1.0317.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
517msReaction time
61.2%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
11.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.4674% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0316%22 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0415%22 Sept
inferno13–100.0617%22 Sept
mirage7–130.0719%21 Sept
dust210–130.0426%21 Sept
dust21–13-0.0720%21 Sept
anubis16–130.0517%21 Sept
dust213–100.0513%21 Sept
dust213–6-0.0410%21 Sept
vertigo13–16-0.0319%21 Sept
mirage11–130.0020%21 Sept
mirage16–140.0323%21 Sept
mirage11–130.1114%20 Sept
dust28–130.0517%20 Sept
dust210–13-0.0127%20 Sept
dust24–13-0.0721%20 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0710%20 Sept
dust25–130.0616%20 Sept
mirage16–140.0121%20 Sept
dust213–40.0513%19 Sept
dust213–10-0.0420%17 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0112%16 Sept
inferno13–60.0327%16 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0620%15 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0312%15 Sept
inferno13–50.0522%15 Sept
anubis13–50.0217%15 Sept
ancient11–130.0124%15 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0119%15 Sept
dust213–11-0.0214%14 Sept
dust213–10-0.0116%14 Sept
ancient10–130.0820%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0417%14 Sept
dust26–13-0.0218%14 Sept
overpass10–130.0614%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.099%12 Sept
overpass5–130.0525%11 Sept
dust214–16-0.0725%11 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0129%9 Sept
dust213–40.0220%9 Sept
dust212–120.0517%9 Sept
dust213–40.0624%9 Sept
dust213–11-0.0515%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0545%7 Sept
dust24–13-0.0321%7 Sept
dust212–12-0.0122%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0721%22 Aug
dust24–130.0114%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0611%21 Aug
ancient2–40.1015%21 Aug
dust213–70.0120%20 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0822%20 Aug
dust210–130.0118%20 Aug
dust26–130.0331%19 Aug
dust213–60.0726%16 Aug
inferno11–130.0420%16 Aug
dust213–00.0426%15 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0115%15 Aug
dust213–80.0219%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0511%15 Aug
dust213–100.0019%12 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0223%12 Aug
dust216–190.0323%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0522%9 Aug
cache5–13-0.0523%8 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0030%8 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0326%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0223%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0523%8 Aug
train16–14-0.0329%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0416%8 Aug
overpass3–130.0531%7 Aug
inferno9–13-0.1017%7 Aug
cache8–13-0.0321%7 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0218%7 Aug
dust213–30.0326%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0620%5 Aug
dust213–50.0527%5 Aug
cache13–100.0229%3 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0518%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.0625%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0327%21 Jul
cache15–150.0321%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0722%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0331%11 Jul
dust213–100.0323%11 Jul
anubis13–60.0130%11 Jul
cache9–13-0.0016%10 Jul
dust210–130.0350%10 Jul
dust28–130.0418%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0847%10 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0218%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.0424%10 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0916%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.0220%10 Jul
dust213–7-0.0018%9 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0712%9 Jul
dust212–12-0.0612%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.0719%7 Jul
dust210–130.0520%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →