Donk 2.0

Donk 2.0 — CS2 Stats

US76561199840925115[U:1:1880659387]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

104Tracked matches60%Win rate2026Tracked since
62Hours in CS
CSDB Rating8.2 StrongEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating23,259Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11121 of 54353 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,418), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate63.1%47.1%50.0%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.8%13.5%13.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.681.081.13above
Match win rate58.0%46.6%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDonk 2.0PREMIER23,259 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning80
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY65314Last 10065%Win rateLWLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.6
Aggression10.0
Utility4.3
Positioning8.0
Opening Duels7.9

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 71% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 71% on CT to 52% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning8.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 8.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07−0.06
first ⅓ avg 0.12 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time435ms−162ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 435ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%−7.0%
first ⅓ avg 33.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — train 12–12
130Biggest win — mirage
12Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 12infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27171063%0.07
dust2S2518772%0.08
nukeS1210283%0.07
ancientA116555%0.10
infernoC104640%0.11
cacheA74357%0.09
anubis21150%0.08
office220100%0.19
vertigo220100%0.11
train1010%0.29
overpass110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

3,984Lifetime kills
1.68K/D · Top 5% of Pink band
200Matches
58.0%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band
63.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Pink band
0.0%Shot accuracy
680MVPs
62Hours (in match)
102Bombs planted
50Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

577dust2
304inferno
229nuke
94vertigo
15train
13office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
4.9°Preaim
425msReaction time
51.8%T opening success
71.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
10.26HE damage / grenade
11.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–130.0529%31 Jul
dust213–30.0217%31 Jul
dust214–160.0622%30 Jul
ancient10–130.0638%29 Jul
inferno11–130.1424%28 Jul
nuke13–110.0528%27 Jul
dust213–100.0416%27 Jul
dust213–100.0527%27 Jul
ancient10–130.1120%26 Jul
mirage3–130.1030%26 Jul
mirage13–30.0419%26 Jul
inferno13–160.0818%25 Jul
dust213–110.0825%24 Jul
mirage13–90.0520%24 Jul
dust213–60.1023%24 Jul
dust213–20.1219%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0825%23 Jul
mirage13–110.1323%23 Jul
cache13–100.0624%23 Jul
mirage2–130.0821%22 Jul
mirage13–50.0726%22 Jul
dust213–60.1524%21 Jul
nuke13–90.0045%21 Jul
mirage13–00.0627%21 Jul
mirage11–130.1021%20 Jul
inferno10–130.0832%20 Jul
dust211–130.1025%19 Jul
mirage13–60.0838%19 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0427%19 Jul
dust213–80.0036%19 Jul
ancient13–70.1725%18 Jul
mirage11–130.0632%17 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0835%17 Jul
mirage13–30.0517%16 Jul
nuke0–3-0.0650%16 Jul
mirage16–130.0924%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0830%16 Jul
dust21–130.0363%16 Jul
ancient5–130.0939%16 Jul
mirage5–130.0323%16 Jul
dust213–60.0930%16 Jul
ancient1–130.0330%16 Jul
inferno12–160.1023%15 Jul
dust29–130.0126%15 Jul
nuke13–90.1232%15 Jul
nuke13–50.1022%15 Jul
dust213–60.0727%15 Jul
cache13–20.1951%15 Jul
ancient13–70.1134%14 Jul
mirage11–130.1526%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0116%14 Jul
nuke13–30.0826%14 Jul
nuke4–130.0725%14 Jul
dust213–80.0923%14 Jul
mirage4–130.0822%14 Jul
ancient13–80.1115%14 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0021%14 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0536%14 Jul
dust211–130.0527%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0824%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0224%13 Jul
cache3–13-0.0126%13 Jul
nuke13–20.0729%13 Jul
inferno13–50.1219%13 Jul
mirage13–20.0618%13 Jul
ancient6–0-0.0050%13 Jul
inferno13–40.1531%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0738%13 Jul
nuke13–30.0931%13 Jul
dust213–60.1147%13 Jul
train12–120.2941%7 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0020%7 Jul
office13–20.1728%6 Jul
anubis13–70.2019%6 Jul
inferno13–80.2525%6 Jul
ancient13–10.2335%6 Jul
nuke13–20.1234%6 Jul
dust213–60.2024%6 Jul
inferno13–60.1034%5 Jul
dust27–40.2530%5 Jul
mirage9–00.0231%5 Jul
cache13–00.1346%5 Jul
vertigo10–20.1330%4 Jul
cache8–130.1833%4 Jul
dust26–00.1243%22 Jun
ancient13–20.2351%9 Jun
dust213–40.0437%8 Jun
mirage13–00.2026%8 Jun
dust213–70.0522%8 Jun
mirage13–20.1644%8 Jun
cache12–120.0734%8 Jun
office13–70.2232%7 Jun
cache13–70.0331%7 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0428%7 Jun
dust212–120.2134%7 Jun
nuke13–80.0843%7 Jun
dust213–10.0321%7 Jun
dust26–130.0529%7 Jun
inferno8–130.0532%6 Jun
vertigo13–50.0835%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches12-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →