10% packet loss enjoyer

10% packet loss enjoyer — CS2 Stats

US76561199825549385[U:1:1865283657]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

490Tracked matches72%Win rate2025Tracked since
268Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning62
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58357Last 10058%Win rateLWWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression10.0
Utility1.9
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.2
Utility1.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time614ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy30.0%+8.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 30.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–4
131Biggest win — ancient
9Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 39infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S39261367%0.03
mirageA2112957%0.01
nukeA1810856%0.02
infernoC104640%0.01
anubis41325%0.01
ancient43175%-0.00
cache21150%0.09
overpass21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,452Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
782Matches
52.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
58.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,391MVPs
268Hours (in match)
269Bombs planted
189Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,236dust2
1,051nuke
1,007inferno
205train
67vertigo
38office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
44%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
77.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
60%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage520%0.8014.2
Inferno367%1.1415.7
Ancient367%1.0515.0
Dust2250%1.1614.5
Train10%1.0017.0
Nuke1100%0.609.0
Overpass10%0.315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.6%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.1%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
618msReaction time
40.7%T opening success
62.5%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
5.34HE damage / grenade
1.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4002 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis0–13-0.0326%29 Aug
ancient13–1-0.036%29 Aug
nuke13–60.1136%27 Aug
cache13–30.1225%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0432%23 Aug
dust213–100.0035%22 Aug
dust213–60.0922%22 Aug
mirage7–20.1225%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0446%12 Jul
dust213–20.0519%9 Jul
mirage7–130.0542%9 Jul
cache8–130.0517%29 Jun
nuke13–30.1724%28 Jun
inferno2–6-0.0410%7 Jun
dust22–13-0.0335%7 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0157%31 May
dust213–40.0121%12 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0212%15 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0522%14 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0131%20 Feb
dust213–50.0827%19 Feb
dust27–10.1122%19 Feb
nuke13–40.1924%19 Feb
dust213–80.0729%18 Feb
mirage13–60.0414%18 Feb
inferno13–60.0940%18 Feb
nuke13–2-0.0357%18 Feb
nuke12–120.0134%17 Feb
mirage4–1-0.0411%17 Feb
inferno13–50.1453%16 Feb
dust213–50.0644%16 Feb
inferno13–110.0445%15 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0446%15 Feb
dust29–130.0135%14 Feb
dust213–70.0333%14 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0522%14 Feb
mirage12–40.0219%13 Feb
dust213–90.0345%13 Feb
dust213–70.0420%13 Feb
dust213–70.0533%13 Feb
nuke13–50.1025%11 Feb
dust213–10.1419%11 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0836%11 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0036%11 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0318%11 Feb
dust27–130.0845%11 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0213%11 Feb
anubis11–130.0029%11 Feb
dust213–60.0122%11 Feb
dust212–120.0326%10 Feb
nuke13–80.0819%10 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0322%10 Feb
dust211–130.0422%10 Feb
dust213–60.0526%10 Feb
dust213–80.0435%10 Feb
mirage7–130.0429%10 Feb
dust212–120.0223%10 Feb
dust216–14-0.0127%6 Feb
mirage13–80.0824%6 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0113%5 Feb
dust26–13-0.0750%5 Feb
dust24–13-0.0438%5 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0022%5 Feb
ancient13–30.0725%5 Feb
dust213–90.0325%5 Feb
dust213–90.0325%5 Feb
inferno11–130.0129%5 Feb
mirage12–120.0410%4 Feb
dust213–50.0326%4 Feb
dust20–7-0.048%4 Feb
dust213–90.0832%4 Feb
mirage3–130.0217%4 Feb
anubis15–150.0324%3 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0315%3 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0321%3 Feb
overpass3–13-0.080%3 Feb
mirage8–130.0221%3 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0528%3 Feb
nuke0–5-0.1350%3 Feb
dust213–50.1118%3 Feb
dust29–130.1123%3 Feb
mirage11–130.0410%2 Feb
dust213–80.0122%2 Feb
ancient13–80.0019%2 Feb
overpass13–90.0926%2 Feb
dust213–110.0328%2 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0029%2 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0618%2 Feb
dust25–13-0.0714%2 Feb
nuke10–130.0125%2 Feb
mirage13–80.1016%2 Feb
anubis13–80.0414%2 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0335%2 Feb
nuke3–130.0120%2 Feb
dust210–130.0828%1 Feb
dust215–15-0.0724%30 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0515%30 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0517%30 Jan
dust213–100.0230%30 Jan
dust213–70.0626%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →