s1mply-bad — CS2 Stats

76561199805299726[U:1:1845033998]

258Tracked matches40%Win rate2026Tracked since
104Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,297Blue band · top ~42.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8313 of 11785 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGs1mply-badPREMIER12,297 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning38
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression1.9
Utility2.7
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 703ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning3.8
Utility2.7
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time689ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 27anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%-0.02
cacheB21111052%-0.02
infernoC1771041%-0.02
anubisC114736%-0.03
nukeC94544%-0.03
ancientB84450%0.01
dust2C52340%-0.03
overpass220100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

3,485Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
280Matches
55.0%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
40.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
457MVPs
104Hours (in match)
359Bombs planted
80Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

520inferno
222dust2
103nuke
60train
15vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
703msReaction time
22.5%T opening success
29.8%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
5.17HE damage / grenade
4.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 702.6982ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4389 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.5252% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache3–13-0.0835%11 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0226%6 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0121%6 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0219%4 Aug
cache8–13-0.0117%4 Aug
mirage13–1-0.026%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0512%2 Aug
ancient13–40.0616%2 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0813%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0211%29 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0712%29 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0024%29 Jul
cache14–16-0.0417%29 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0517%29 Jul
inferno10–130.0229%29 Jul
cache9–13-0.0310%25 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0513%25 Jul
mirage13–20.025%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0111%25 Jul
ancient13–16-0.039%25 Jul
dust21–5-0.073%25 Jul
inferno7–130.0118%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.098%24 Jul
anubis13–110.0511%23 Jul
ancient13–40.119%23 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0718%23 Jul
cache8–13-0.0122%23 Jul
nuke12–16-0.045%23 Jul
cache10–13-0.0123%23 Jul
mirage13–60.0315%23 Jul
inferno10–130.0411%18 Jul
ancient10–13-0.039%18 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0422%11 Jul
cache13–10-0.0117%11 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0317%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0412%11 Jul
cache13–8-0.048%11 Jul
nuke13–160.0211%11 Jul
cache13–8-0.0812%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0118%11 Jul
inferno2–7-0.038%9 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0410%9 Jul
cache3–13-0.0711%9 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0113%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.054%9 Jul
cache13–8-0.0110%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0611%9 Jul
nuke13–60.009%9 Jul
mirage10–130.0319%9 Jul
anubis13–30.0810%9 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0213%9 Jul
cache5–13-0.0314%7 Jul
cache13–40.0614%7 Jul
cache13–7-0.0218%7 Jul
cache13–10.0419%7 Jul
cache6–13-0.0713%7 Jul
dust210–13-0.0720%7 Jul
cache13–6-0.0216%7 Jul
cache12–120.0317%7 Jul
cache13–2-0.0813%7 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0914%7 Jul
mirage13–30.0319%7 Jul
cache13–3-0.0011%7 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1627%7 Jul
mirage13–8-0.019%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.050%3 Jul
mirage13–50.0619%2 Jul
dust213–90.0131%2 Jul
ancient7–130.0115%2 Jul
mirage1–5-0.0250%27 Jun
anubis13–40.0117%27 Jun
mirage5–13-0.028%27 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0110%27 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0710%27 Jun
inferno16–130.0018%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0615%25 Jun
ancient13–110.0617%25 Jun
dust213–9-0.0120%25 Jun
mirage9–130.0617%25 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0616%21 Jun
anubis9–13-0.076%21 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0526%21 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0418%21 Jun
dust27–13-0.0115%21 Jun
anubis4–13-0.1311%21 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0721%21 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0312%19 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0614%19 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0018%18 May
inferno13–6-0.0410%18 May
mirage15–15-0.0413%18 May
overpass13–6-0.0528%18 May
nuke13–60.0224%18 May
ancient15–15-0.0312%17 May
inferno11–13-0.0320%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0113%16 May
mirage13–10-0.034%16 May
inferno13–40.034%16 May
anubis13–50.0117%16 May
mirage13–4-0.0313%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →