RoCk_R4y

RoCk_R4y — CS2 Stats

HU76561199786219036[U:1:1825953308]Steam profile ↗

874Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,192Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating14,134Blue band · top ~33% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4697 of 6931 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,048 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRoCk_R4yFACEITLevel 5 · 1,048 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,134 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLWLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression6.2
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time634ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C35142140%-0.02
mirageA29181162%0.01
ancientA149564%-0.02
infernoA95456%-0.03
nukeC83538%-0.01
anubis31233%-0.02
cache21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,478Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
1,636Matches
45.4%Match win rate
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,907MVPs
720Hours (in match)
847Bombs planted
425Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,874
AWP1,773
MP91,424
Knife689

Lifetime map wins

4,699dust2
2,701inferno
1,416nuke
145train
28vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

758Matches
49%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
75.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21451%0.9514.9
Dust220649%0.9614.6
Inferno12052%0.9715.7
Ancient11745%0.9415.1
Nuke7146%0.9414.8
Anubis1331%0.7412.8
Train757%1.2715.9
Cache667%0.8213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
632msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
7.28HE damage / grenade
14.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3796% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–16-0.0614%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0117%20 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0914%11 Aug
ancient16–14-0.038%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0117%5 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0819%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0321%30 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0420%30 Jul
dust213–7-0.0013%30 Jul
dust213–40.0212%28 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0220%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0322%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0116%24 Jul
dust216–14-0.0419%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0516%23 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0814%22 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0216%16 Jul
cache10–13-0.0332%16 Jul
nuke11–13-0.037%16 Jul
dust213–60.0528%16 Jul
dust210–13-0.0421%15 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0419%15 Jul
mirage13–40.0535%15 Jul
cache13–6-0.017%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.0617%12 Jul
mirage13–00.1019%12 Jul
dust27–13-0.0715%12 Jul
dust215–150.0018%8 Jul
anubis9–130.0313%3 Jul
mirage7–130.0221%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0310%27 Jun
inferno13–110.0016%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.0116%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0521%23 Jun
dust211–13-0.0323%20 Jun
mirage13–80.0721%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0715%20 Jun
mirage7–3-0.0225%20 Jun
ancient7–130.0219%20 Jun
dust22–13-0.0633%19 Jun
dust211–13-0.0426%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0223%17 Jun
mirage13–110.0419%17 Jun
dust213–10-0.0325%17 Jun
dust213–60.0524%12 Jun
mirage13–60.0115%12 Jun
dust213–5-0.0211%12 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0714%11 Jun
dust216–130.0018%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0315%11 Jun
ancient13–110.0316%9 Jun
dust26–13-0.0419%9 Jun
dust213–90.0115%9 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0414%9 Jun
dust216–13-0.0429%7 Jun
ancient13–100.0312%7 Jun
mirage13–60.0722%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0513%6 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0224%4 Jun
dust213–10-0.0511%4 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0119%4 Jun
dust27–13-0.0513%3 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0314%3 Jun
dust219–22-0.0211%2 Jun
mirage13–80.0219%2 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0110%2 Jun
inferno19–16-0.0110%31 May
dust213–7-0.0210%31 May
mirage13–4-0.0318%31 May
nuke8–13-0.0014%30 May
dust213–90.0117%30 May
ancient13–9-0.0515%30 May
nuke13–6-0.0217%30 May
mirage13–30.1013%30 May
dust28–13-0.0312%30 May
mirage13–100.0517%30 May
dust211–13-0.0613%29 May
mirage5–130.0016%29 May
nuke13–4-0.0020%29 May
mirage13–60.0727%29 May
mirage11–130.0313%28 May
inferno13–90.0031%28 May
ancient13–7-0.0216%28 May
dust23–13-0.0514%27 May
dust28–130.0223%27 May
mirage9–13-0.0319%27 May
mirage10–13-0.0118%27 May
dust29–13-0.0511%27 May
mirage13–100.0420%25 May
ancient5–13-0.0613%25 May
anubis10–13-0.0621%25 May
dust214–16-0.0618%24 May
mirage8–13-0.0218%24 May
ancient13–3-0.0315%24 May
dust25–13-0.0314%24 May
nuke8–13-0.0211%22 May
ancient8–2-0.0118%22 May
nuke13–60.0618%22 May
nuke10–13-0.0126%22 May
dust212–16-0.0421%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →