atari — CS2 Stats

76561199654958018[U:1:1694692290]

1,065Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
545Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#47637 of 54830 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,322 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,322Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,322
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 178 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate55.4%48.5%51.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.3%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.231.071.08above
Match win rate52.1%47.0%48.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGatariFACEITLevel 9 · 2,322 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,322csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning46
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5248Last 10052%Win rateWWLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression4.1
Utility5.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time577ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB23121152%-0.01
ancientB21111052%-0.02
dust2A1811761%-0.02
overpassB126650%-0.03
infernoC94544%-0.03
mirageC83538%-0.01
nukeS54180%-0.00
cache31233%-0.03
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,060Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
1,153Matches
52.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
55.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,617MVPs
545Hours (in match)
924Bombs planted
385Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,057
AWP1,203
Knife738
MP9561
HE Grenade222

Lifetime map wins

1,587inferno
1,023dust2
753nuke
355vertigo
191train
59office
27italy
8ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

964Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
79.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26351%1.1316.4
Anubis18558%1.1917.7
Ancient14551%1.0115.9
Inferno12248%1.0916.2
Overpass7947%1.0915.8
Dust26455%1.0614.9
Nuke5558%1.0615.4
Vertigo3040%1.0316.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.3%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
575msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
11.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4784 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2056% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–120.0322%27 Jul
ancient13–70.0618%27 Jul
inferno17–190.0122%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.0515%29 May
anubis13–5-0.0116%26 May
dust213–2-0.0133%26 May
ancient9–13-0.069%25 May
anubis17–19-0.0113%25 May
dust225–21-0.0415%25 May
ancient3–130.0130%22 May
inferno22–25-0.057%22 May
inferno20–22-0.0222%21 May
dust29–13-0.0214%21 May
anubis9–13-0.068%20 May
overpass13–9-0.0110%20 May
cache8–130.0222%20 May
anubis6–130.0218%19 May
dust213–3-0.0511%19 May
ancient13–50.0319%19 May
anubis6–13-0.0415%18 May
dust21–13-0.1016%18 May
inferno13–40.049%17 May
anubis9–130.0213%17 May
cache5–13-0.0665%16 May
dust213–70.0116%16 May
ancient22–180.0016%13 May
dust213–9-0.0520%13 May
anubis13–50.0115%13 May
overpass13–11-0.0114%12 May
anubis6–13-0.0114%11 May
ancient6–13-0.0713%11 May
mirage5–13-0.0417%11 May
overpass4–13-0.0615%9 May
anubis13–40.0223%9 May
ancient11–13-0.0410%9 May
dust214–16-0.0319%7 May
anubis6–13-0.0226%7 May
ancient13–40.0414%3 May
dust213–80.0122%2 May
cache13–11-0.059%2 May
overpass13–2-0.026%24 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0237%22 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0423%20 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0321%15 Apr
dust25–130.0523%14 Apr
ancient3–13-0.087%14 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0416%14 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0412%13 Apr
dust213–10-0.0710%13 Apr
ancient2–13-0.049%13 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0311%12 Apr
ancient13–1-0.0017%11 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0220%11 Apr
ancient6–13-0.076%11 Apr
ancient19–16-0.0217%10 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0219%10 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0612%10 Apr
dust213–9-0.0116%9 Apr
anubis13–30.1014%8 Apr
ancient16–12-0.0320%8 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0526%8 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0819%5 Apr
dust213–70.0427%4 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0619%4 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0518%4 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0316%3 Apr
mirage13–60.0017%3 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0822%2 Apr
anubis13–100.0222%1 Apr
ancient13–9-0.079%31 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0415%30 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0326%30 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0528%29 Mar
dust26–13-0.0611%28 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0116%28 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0116%28 Mar
dust29–13-0.0434%28 Mar
ancient13–20.0612%28 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0323%27 Mar
ancient13–7-0.046%27 Mar
anubis13–8-0.0129%27 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0816%27 Mar
overpass6–13-0.047%26 Mar
dust213–40.0718%25 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0614%25 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0026%25 Mar
anubis16–140.0324%24 Mar
mirage11–130.0434%23 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0212%16 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0614%15 Mar
anubis16–13-0.0719%15 Mar
ancient12–16-0.0311%14 Mar
dust216–19-0.0322%14 Mar
office9–13-0.0131%13 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0728%13 Mar
nuke13–50.0518%13 Mar
anubis13–100.0322%13 Mar
mirage13–50.0229%13 Mar
overpass10–130.0022%12 Mar
mirage13–30.0519%12 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →