İSKENDER SİZDEN BÜYÜK — CS2 Stats
76561199628394077[U:1:1668128349]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 6 median | Level 7 median | vs Level 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 47.4% | 44.7% | 46.1% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 11.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.05 | meets |
| Match win rate | 52.1% | 45.2% | 45.7% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 90% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 23 | 12–11 | 52% | 0.02 | |
| S | 23 | 17–6 | 74% | 0.07 | |
| B | 22 | 10–12 | 45% | 0.06 | |
| A | 18 | 10–8 | 56% | 0.05 | |
| D | 7 | 2–5 | 29% | 0.03 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.03 | |
| warden | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.12 |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.13 | |
| poseidon | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.22 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 39 | 46% | 1.32 | 17.1 |
| Inferno | 29 | 52% | 1.41 | 21.9 |
| Dust2 | 22 | 50% | 1.18 | 16.7 |
| Ancient | 14 | 50% | 1.07 | 14.9 |
| Nuke | 10 | 60% | 1.24 | 20.5 |
| Anubis | 9 | 56% | 1.39 | 14.4 |
| Overpass | 2 | 50% | 0.78 | 10.0 |
| Cache | 1 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 33% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 17% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.04 | 26% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 25% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 27% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 22% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 27% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.04 | 21% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 17% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 8–0 | -0.01 | 17% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.06 | 33% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.10 | 19% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.07 | 24% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 17% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 14% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.12 | 16% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.02 | 25% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 9–5 | -0.02 | 19% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 30% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 41% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.09 | 28% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 21% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.11 | 29% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.14 | 25% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.10 | 43% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 17% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.11 | 30% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 5–9 | 0.09 | 23% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.06 | 33% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.16 | 23% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.19 | 17% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.07 | 22% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.17 | 29% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.21 | 39% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.05 | 26% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 9–7 | 0.16 | 29% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.04 | 23% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 22% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.09 | 27% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 0% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.12 | 17% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 9–6 | -0.09 | 35% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 26% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 19% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.08 | 19% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.14 | 34% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 26 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.04 | 22% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.18 | 23% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.13 | 24% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.25 | 15% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.04 | 26% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 18–22 | 0.00 | 18% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.15 | 21% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 9–0 | 0.28 | 11% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 19% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 9–2 | -0.01 | 14% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 9–7 | 0.08 | 28% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.01 | 26% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 26% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 21% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.01 | 25% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.07 | 30% | 5 Jul → | ||
| warden | 10–13 | 0.12 | 28% | 4 Jul → | |
| 8–8 | -0.06 | 30% | 4 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 31% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.07 | 21% | 3 Jul → | ||
| 4–9 | -0.07 | 19% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 12–0 | 0.13 | 37% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.04 | 30% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 22% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.01 | 35% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 0–3 | 0.05 | 33% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.08 | 20% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.15 | 25% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 3–9 | -0.12 | 9% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 13–1 | -0.04 | 44% | 1 Jul → | ||
| 3–2 | 0.05 | 25% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.07 | 18% | 29 Jun → | ||
| poseidon | 1–9 | -0.22 | 13% | 28 Jun → | |
| 9–5 | 0.07 | 24% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 9–3 | 0.21 | 31% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 21% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 35% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 15% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.13 | 20% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.08 | 26% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.00 | 21% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.04 | 22% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 9–7 | -0.07 | 14% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.02 | 20% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 23% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.09 | 15% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.12 | 18% | 22 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.