DyosNoMiss

DyosNoMiss — CS2 Stats

76561199517600618[U:1:1557334890]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

137Tracked matches38%Win rate2026Tracked since
199Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.9 Learning
Premier CS Rating4,305Grey band · top ~81.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9155 of 12019 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDyosNoMissPREMIER4,305 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning35
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34597Last 10034%Win rateLLWTLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.9
Aggression5.3
Utility1.0
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 677ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning3.5
Utility1.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact1.0

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time682ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 727ms → last ⅓ avg 682ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 16–14
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 48% over 33anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB33161748%-0.03
infernoD2571828%-0.03
dust2D1651131%-0.02
nukeD102820%-0.04
ancientC83538%-0.03
anubisD6060%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,179Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
468Matches
43.8%Match win rate
30.1%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,035MVPs
199Hours (in match)
482Bombs planted
109Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,340dust2
793inferno
307nuke
6vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
43%Win rate
0.58Avg K/D
56.0ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno250%0.809.5
Dust2250%0.539.5
Nuke10%0.5010.0
Anubis1100%0.336.0
Mirage10%0.6012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
677msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.14Enemies flashed / flash
1.1%Flash assists
9.12HE damage / grenade
1.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0663% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1422 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.9744% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0126%1 Jul
ancient2–13-0.120%21 Jun
inferno13–7-0.017%10 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0312%3 Jun
inferno7–13-0.055%1 Jun
dust26–13-0.0217%31 May
inferno13–80.0317%31 May
dust213–6-0.0415%31 May
mirage13–11-0.0425%30 May
mirage13–9-0.0418%30 May
mirage0–13-0.1011%28 May
dust214–16-0.0121%27 May
inferno9–13-0.1010%27 May
mirage8–13-0.0431%26 May
mirage13–7-0.029%26 May
inferno10–13-0.0816%25 May
mirage13–50.0217%23 May
overpass16–13-0.0212%22 May
anubis4–13-0.070%22 May
nuke5–13-0.089%21 May
anubis6–13-0.019%21 May
anubis6–13-0.098%19 May
nuke2–9-0.1813%18 May
ancient10–13-0.0215%18 May
inferno13–6-0.0418%17 May
mirage5–130.0016%17 May
dust29–130.0115%17 May
anubis9–13-0.0120%16 May
dust216–12-0.070%16 May
inferno8–13-0.074%16 May
ancient13–80.064%16 May
mirage13–5-0.0311%14 May
anubis10–130.0112%13 May
inferno8–8-0.099%12 May
inferno2–13-0.0721%12 May
nuke11–130.0411%10 May
mirage13–60.0217%8 May
dust213–7-0.039%7 May
mirage7–13-0.0115%6 May
mirage13–20.0412%2 May
dust210–130.074%2 May
mirage13–10-0.0218%2 May
inferno11–130.039%2 May
mirage14–16-0.036%1 May
inferno10–13-0.047%1 May
mirage16–140.0517%30 Apr
mirage9–130.069%30 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0722%27 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0616%26 Apr
mirage13–30.0329%25 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0817%23 Apr
inferno10–130.0413%23 Apr
dust25–13-0.0614%22 Apr
mirage13–80.028%22 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0210%20 Apr
overpass9–13-0.117%19 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0615%18 Apr
inferno10–130.0017%18 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0612%6 Apr
inferno16–130.0122%6 Apr
dust26–13-0.1122%5 Apr
inferno13–7-0.040%5 Apr
ancient8–13-0.087%5 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0511%5 Apr
ancient13–30.0813%4 Apr
nuke9–130.0117%4 Apr
dust212–16-0.0312%2 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0810%1 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0529%1 Apr
dust216–140.0915%1 Apr
mirage9–130.0221%30 Mar
inferno16–13-0.058%29 Mar
dust213–10-0.033%29 Mar
inferno1–13-0.003%29 Mar
inferno11–13-0.008%29 Mar
inferno5–13-0.096%28 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0811%28 Mar
nuke13–70.0413%27 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0719%26 Mar
mirage3–13-0.140%26 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0318%24 Mar
mirage4–13-0.107%22 Mar
mirage9–130.0317%22 Mar
dust210–13-0.067%21 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0215%21 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0116%21 Mar
inferno9–60.095%19 Mar
dust28–13-0.0310%19 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0225%19 Mar
inferno12–12-0.034%18 Mar
inferno8–8-0.0319%15 Mar
mirage6–4-0.070%15 Mar
nuke15–15-0.035%15 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0418%14 Mar
mirage0–13-0.1156%9 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0120%8 Mar
dust27–13-0.078%7 Mar
dust212–120.0613%4 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0121%4 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0423%3 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →