LatinaGetter12

LatinaGetter12 — CS2 Stats

76561199468940212[U:1:1508674484]Steam profile ↗

829Tracked matches41%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,330Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,219Purple band · top ~19.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19199 of 35911 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 769 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

16,794Peak Premier on CSDB
769Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 769
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 132 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,219
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,781 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate33.4%44.9%46.2%12.9% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.8%12.5%12.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.041.060.18 short
Match win rate40.8%45.3%45.9%5.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLatinaGetter12FACEITLevel 6 · 769 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,219 · Purple bandPEAK ELO769csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning54
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36577Last 10036%Win rateWWLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2
Aggression7.7
Utility1.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.8

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.4
Utility1.8
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time591ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 11.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 15–15
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C26101638%-0.02
nukeD2471729%0.01
mirageC2491538%0.00
anubisC83538%-0.01
infernoD61517%-0.03
ancientA53260%-0.01
overpass42250%0.01
cache31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,067Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,646Matches
40.8%Match win rate
33.4%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
4,089MVPs
994Hours (in match)
1,062Bombs planted
497Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,759dust2
3,191nuke
969inferno
633train
276vertigo
3ar_baggage
1office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

133Matches
56%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
91.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24248%1.1016.8
Nuke3661%1.3718.3
Mirage2854%1.3019.5
Anubis1173%1.2415.1
Cache650%1.3318.3
Ancient580%1.2819.6
Overpass367%1.2518.0
Vertigo10%1.0015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
90.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
598msReaction time
43.5%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
8.17HE damage / grenade
2.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2566% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4771 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0315%29 Aug
nuke13–80.0226%28 Aug
mirage1–10-0.029%24 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0113%21 Aug
dust213–2-0.0216%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.0219%19 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0010%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0610%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.0725%12 Aug
nuke13–110.057%9 Aug
ancient19–16-0.0214%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0922%8 Aug
dust213–16-0.035%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0611%7 Aug
cache13–9-0.0214%7 Aug
mirage13–9-0.057%7 Aug
inferno11–130.008%7 Aug
dust210–130.049%30 Jul
mirage2–100.0226%29 Jul
nuke15–150.1018%29 Jul
dust25–130.0114%28 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0116%27 Jul
mirage15–150.0815%26 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0717%26 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0312%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0215%26 Jul
inferno15–150.0211%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0114%26 Jul
ancient13–50.074%25 Jul
ancient11–13-0.035%25 Jul
mirage13–30.0213%25 Jul
dust216–12-0.0311%25 Jul
cache8–130.0210%25 Jul
mirage10–130.037%25 Jul
nuke11–130.0416%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.024%25 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0619%24 Jul
dust213–110.0510%24 Jul
dust27–130.0312%24 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0119%24 Jul
mirage6–130.0518%23 Jul
nuke15–150.0810%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0619%23 Jul
anubis13–90.0211%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0611%20 Jul
dust27–13-0.019%13 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0821%12 Jul
mirage14–16-0.016%12 Jul
nuke13–80.0618%12 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0215%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0418%11 Jul
mirage13–90.0212%10 Jul
nuke11–130.0615%10 Jul
nuke15–150.0212%10 Jul
anubis9–130.009%9 Jul
dust213–70.0819%9 Jul
dust28–130.0123%9 Jul
nuke15–150.0219%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0311%9 Jul
dust23–13-0.0315%26 Jun
dust28–130.0320%20 Jun
mirage4–13-0.060%19 Jun
nuke5–130.018%19 Jun
anubis4–130.018%13 Jun
mirage10–130.025%13 Jun
dust213–6-0.0224%12 Jun
dust28–13-0.0318%11 Jun
dust213–16-0.037%10 Jun
ancient7–13-0.080%10 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0513%10 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0510%10 Jun
nuke13–100.0212%10 Jun
dust213–8-0.0116%10 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0515%10 Jun
mirage14–160.0712%9 Jun
nuke7–13-0.073%8 Jun
mirage6–13-0.049%8 Jun
ancient13–60.026%8 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0610%8 Jun
dust24–13-0.093%8 Jun
overpass12–16-0.028%7 Jun
mirage11–13-0.029%7 Jun
mirage13–8-0.078%6 Jun
dust213–8-0.1310%6 Jun
overpass13–70.036%6 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0020%6 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0630%6 Jun
nuke11–13-0.018%6 Jun
overpass10–130.006%6 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0412%6 Jun
nuke13–10-0.008%5 Jun
overpass13–100.017%5 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0211%5 Jun
nuke5–13-0.1014%5 Jun
dust213–1-0.0015%5 Jun
dust215–15-0.0317%5 Jun
dust213–9-0.059%5 Jun
nuke13–100.0415%5 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0031%5 Jun
dust29–13-0.0410%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →