Matti — CS2 Stats

PL76561199353716989[U:1:1393451261]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

415Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,835Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating29,209Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#224 of 31429 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	40.3%	42.5%	44.2%	3.9% short
Shot accuracy	4.8%	10.9%	11.2%	6.4% short
Kill/death ratio	1.02	0.99	1.04	meets
Match win rate	45.0%	44.2%	45.3%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning38

Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD63–35–2Last 10063%Win rateLWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0

Aggression5.4

Utility1.9

Positioning3.8

Opening Duels0.4

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 52 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning3.8

Utility1.9

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels0.8

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.07

first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time484ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms

Headshot accuracy19.8%−5.3%

first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.34Best rating — inferno 13–6

13–0Biggest win — ancient

25Longest win streak

5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 18mirageWeakest map · 54% over 39

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	39	21–18	54%	0.03
nuke	S	18	14–4	78%	0.06
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.04
dust2	S	10	7–3	70%	0.06
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.06
ancient	S	8	6–2	75%	0.05
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	0.06
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (54% over 39). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,857Lifetime kills

1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

1,907Matches

45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

40.3%Headshot %

4.8%Shot accuracy

4,027MVPs

640Hours (in match)

2,810Bombs planted

497Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,857

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,646

AWP2,981

Knife2,435

P2000 / USP-S2,200

FAMAS2,000

Galil AR1,787

Glock-181,488

MAC-10787

MP9767

Lifetime map wins

2,445nuke

2,384dust2

1,944inferno

234vertigo

151train

61office

52italy

21lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches

54%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

77.4ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	55	47%	0.93	14.4
Dust2	41	54%	1.22	17.1
Anubis	20	60%	1.17	15.7
Nuke	16	88%	1.15	15.3
Ancient	12	50%	1.01	13.1
Inferno	11	36%	1.37	15.0
Cache	6	50%	0.86	12.5
Overpass	3	67%	1.30	17.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.9%Spray accuracy

74.2%Counter-strafing

6.5°Preaim

455msReaction time

26.9%T opening success

36.0%CT opening success

0.22Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

11.71HE damage / grenade

1.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2161 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.9118% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	12–16	-0.05	27%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	21%	24 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.08	5%	24 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.09	6%	18 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	100%	18 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	25%	18 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	12%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.08	9%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–6	0.06	10%	17 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.04	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	9–7	0.12	14%	10 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.07	9%	9 Aug →
nuke	8–8	0.03	17%	31 Jul →
nuke	5–9	0.00	17%	31 Jul →
inferno	3–9	-0.19	10%	31 Jul →
mirage	0–9	-0.03	20%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	7%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.11	15%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	44%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	30%	22 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	22%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	60%	22 Jul →
mirage	0–5	-0.07	0%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.08	8%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	42%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	8%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.08	13%	21 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.08	33%	21 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.09	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.03	0%	21 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	0%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.20	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.25	10%	21 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.10	22%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.09	17%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.21	15%	21 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.08	9%	21 Jul →
ancient	0–2	-0.09	0%	21 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	6%	21 Jul →
mirage	3–2	0.14	0%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.29	22%	20 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	50%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.27	42%	20 Jul →
nuke	4–1	-0.02	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	9%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.08	7%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.34	5%	18 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.04	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	30%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	67%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.09	17%	17 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.12	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.03	0%	17 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	45%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.14	32%	17 Jul →
boulder	6–13	-0.01	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	0%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.07	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	0%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	16 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.04	31%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–4	0.08	43%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.09	28%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.19	41%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	23%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.01	17%	15 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	33%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	9%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.21	23%	15 Jul →
cache	13–2	-0.02	30%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.09	29%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.16	28%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	32%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.03	20%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.06	50%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	31%	14 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	44%	14 Jul →
anubis	7–2	0.02	46%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.04	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.12	33%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.18	22%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.11	15%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	16%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.09	47%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.21	21%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.21	26%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.18	33%	13 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.15	28%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.12	18%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	8%	12 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	14%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	23%	10 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.03	13%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.04	26%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.00	14%	9 Jul →