HyDra #Boobies

HyDra #Boobies — CS2 Stats

76561199250915828[U:1:1290650100]Steam profile ↗

399Tracked matches41%Win rate2023Tracked since
593Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning61
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54397Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression7.9
Utility3.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 774ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.1
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time776ms+52ms
first ⅓ avg 725ms → last ⅓ avg 776ms
Headshot accuracy37.7%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 40.9% → last ⅓ avg 37.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–6
131Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
W4Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16dust2Weakest map · 47% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1991047%-0.00
cacheB189950%0.01
mirageB178947%0.01
nukeS1611569%0.02
infernoA148657%0.03
ancientA85363%-0.01
anubis3030%-0.06
overpass220100%0.01
office110100%-0.07
warden110100%0.00
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,514Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
708Matches
50.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
70.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
1.8%Shot accuracy
1,439MVPs
266Hours (in match)
700Bombs planted
139Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,470dust2
1,148nuke
823inferno
305train
294vertigo
56office
15italy
5cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
47%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
64.4ADR
75%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2667%1.0614.0
Mirage650%0.589.5
Ancient540%0.6611.8
Inferno450%0.8113.8
Cache333%1.0815.0
Train20%0.609.5
Anubis250%0.7812.0
Nuke250%1.0218.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

38.5%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
774msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
3.69HE damage / grenade
4.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 773.9519ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2746% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0732%23 Aug
dust213–20.0440%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0339%23 Aug
inferno13–70.0252%21 Aug
inferno3–50.0617%19 Aug
dust26–13-0.0638%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0538%16 Aug
dust28–130.0141%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0320%30 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0345%2 Jul
mirage13–60.0948%1 Jul
mirage9–130.0142%27 May
mirage15–15-0.0627%25 May
nuke4–13-0.0043%25 May
ancient13–40.1334%24 May
cache10–130.0028%23 May
mirage13–60.0539%23 May
mirage9–130.0333%23 May
inferno6–130.0331%23 May
ancient2–13-0.120%23 May
nuke5–13-0.0633%22 May
cache5–13-0.0150%22 May
nuke13–80.0540%22 May
inferno13–10-0.0752%20 May
cache6–130.0254%20 May
nuke1–70.0841%20 May
overpass13–11-0.0237%20 May
inferno12–160.0833%19 May
dust26–13-0.0143%19 May
dust213–6-0.0447%19 May
mirage14–16-0.0440%19 May
cache13–90.0146%19 May
nuke13–10-0.0143%19 May
dust213–80.1030%19 May
cache7–13-0.0536%18 May
mirage10–130.0141%18 May
dust213–8-0.0649%17 May
mirage13–90.0332%17 May
mirage13–6-0.0446%17 May
dust213–90.0238%17 May
nuke13–110.0337%17 May
cache7–130.0536%17 May
dust27–13-0.0437%16 May
cache12–12-0.0148%16 May
nuke13–100.1245%16 May
cache11–13-0.0544%16 May
cache13–20.0571%16 May
nuke5–13-0.0141%16 May
nuke16–140.0140%16 May
ancient13–90.0354%16 May
ancient13–1-0.0237%16 May
mirage7–130.0650%15 May
office13–8-0.0731%15 May
cache12–120.0451%15 May
cache13–9-0.0045%15 May
nuke13–110.0141%14 May
ancient5–10.0767%14 May
nuke13–11-0.0133%14 May
overpass13–40.0453%14 May
dust216–12-0.0523%14 May
ancient13–6-0.0226%14 May
dust212–12-0.0045%14 May
nuke13–40.0740%14 May
warden13–110.0030%13 May
mirage12–120.0348%13 May
cache2–7-0.0250%12 May
dust213–110.0234%12 May
nuke13–30.1037%12 May
dust29–130.1339%11 May
cache10–00.1262%10 May
mirage9–00.0150%10 May
dust210–130.0144%10 May
train11–13-0.0440%10 May
inferno11–13-0.0336%9 May
anubis6–13-0.0728%9 May
inferno9–50.0762%8 May
inferno9–10.0432%8 May
dust212–12-0.0439%8 May
cache13–60.0467%8 May
ancient7–13-0.1133%7 May
cache13–110.0149%7 May
dust213–10-0.0548%7 May
cache13–50.0456%7 May
anubis11–13-0.0529%5 May
inferno8–130.0126%5 May
mirage13–70.0717%5 May
mirage16–13-0.0324%5 May
inferno13–70.0342%4 May
mirage9–00.0848%4 May
ancient7–13-0.0346%3 May
inferno13–5-0.0521%2 May
cache13–40.0247%2 May
mirage11–13-0.0140%1 May
dust210–13-0.0133%29 Apr
inferno9–60.2281%29 Apr
cache13–100.0236%29 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0421%15 Apr
dust212–120.0049%13 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0615%10 Apr
inferno13–80.0253%8 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →