Holllow

Holllow — CS2 Stats

76561198891452021[U:1:931186293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,421Tracked matches38%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,756Blue band · top ~29.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16113 of 25025 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHolllowFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,756 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning59
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43507Last 10043%Win rateWLLLWLTTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression10.0
Utility4.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch9.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact1.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time649ms−117ms
first ⅓ avg 765ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.53Best rating — debris 9–0
130Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 50% over 6mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB56272948%0.02
dust2D1861233%0.00
nukeC83538%0.08
officeB63350%0.02
mirageD51420%0.03
debris31233%0.15
vertigo21150%0.03
train1010%-0.02
eldorado110100%0.27

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
18%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
72.1ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Italy40%0.6811.0
Dust2250%0.7216.0
Anubis250%0.8613.5
Mirage10%0.4411.0
Ancient10%0.6710.0
Nuke10%0.8511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
644msReaction time
45.4%T opening success
60.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
14.20HE damage / grenade
2.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.467 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–90.1724%29 Aug
dust210–130.0422%29 Aug
office11–13-0.0315%28 Aug
cache6–13-0.078%28 Aug
cache13–60.0524%28 Aug
cache10–13-0.0126%27 Aug
cache12–12-0.0142%27 Aug
cache12–120.0339%27 Aug
nuke9–130.0133%27 Aug
cache10–130.0727%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0340%27 Aug
cache13–110.0525%26 Aug
nuke12–120.0628%26 Aug
mirage9–130.0223%26 Aug
dust213–100.0631%26 Aug
cache1–13-0.0631%26 Aug
cache12–12-0.0313%26 Aug
cache13–80.0822%26 Aug
cache11–130.0710%26 Aug
cache6–130.0320%24 Aug
cache1–60.0843%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0517%23 Aug
nuke13–70.0118%23 Aug
cache5–130.1623%23 Aug
dust213–80.0423%23 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0413%23 Aug
dust213–40.0623%23 Aug
cache13–50.1536%23 Aug
cache13–70.1441%23 Aug
cache10–130.0030%22 Aug
cache13–4-0.0615%22 Aug
cache9–10.0323%22 Aug
mirage12–120.0518%21 Aug
cache5–130.0225%21 Aug
dust28–130.0931%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0219%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.0452%19 Aug
office13–8-0.016%18 Aug
dust24–13-0.0612%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0414%18 Aug
cache13–100.0248%18 Aug
cache13–20.0023%17 Aug
cache13–2-0.0123%17 Aug
office13–50.1822%16 Aug
dust29–13-0.0531%16 Aug
dust213–100.1223%16 Aug
cache6–130.0226%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0518%15 Aug
cache13–100.0519%15 Aug
office13–5-0.0136%15 Aug
cache5–130.0119%14 Aug
cache10–130.0033%14 Aug
nuke5–130.1034%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0823%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0330%14 Aug
office7–13-0.0823%13 Aug
train8–13-0.0231%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0319%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0830%13 Aug
cache11–13-0.0739%13 Aug
cache13–60.1229%12 Aug
cache16–130.0018%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0332%12 Aug
nuke13–80.0416%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.0716%11 Aug
cache13–30.1327%10 Aug
cache3–13-0.0725%9 Aug
cache13–00.0619%9 Aug
cache13–80.0035%8 Aug
cache13–4-0.0127%5 Aug
debris9–00.5343%5 Aug
debris2–9-0.1413%5 Aug
nuke8–80.2413%5 Aug
eldorado9–20.2731%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0438%5 Aug
cache6–130.0329%5 Aug
cache13–5-0.0345%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0333%4 Aug
vertigo13–110.0924%4 Aug
office10–130.0726%4 Aug
cache8–130.0436%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0322%4 Aug
cache4–13-0.0332%3 Aug
cache13–100.0526%3 Aug
cache13–60.1721%2 Aug
cache3–13-0.0318%1 Aug
dust23–13-0.0438%1 Aug
dust27–20.0740%1 Aug
debris6–90.0716%1 Aug
cache5–13-0.0519%31 Jul
cache13–10-0.0515%31 Jul
dust213–90.0126%31 Jul
cache13–50.0140%31 Jul
cache13–30.0630%31 Jul
cache4–20.0410%31 Jul
cache12–12-0.0112%30 Jul
cache13–20.0721%29 Jul
cache13–40.0423%29 Jul
cache13–9-0.0023%29 Jul
cache0–13-0.0221%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →