Izet Nanic

Izet Nanic — CS2 Stats

76561199107855491[U:1:1147589763]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

756Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,006Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,165Purple band · top ~19.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25000 of 47719 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,455 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate36.8%46.1%47.0%10.2% short
Shot accuracy1.2%12.6%12.7%11.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.051.07meets
Match win rate45.8%45.7%46.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIzet NanicFACEITLevel 7 · 1,455 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,165 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning70
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58366Last 10058%Win rateLWLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression9.1
Utility4.2
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning7.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time564ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 21anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB27141352%0.03
mirageS2115671%0.03
infernoA1911858%0.04
dust2S1410471%0.04
anubisD82625%-0.00
ancientD72529%0.01
nuke440100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,096Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
1,114Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
36.8%Headshot %
1.2%Shot accuracy
2,865MVPs
412Hours (in match)
1,163Bombs planted
330Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,278inferno
1,505dust2
832nuke
579vertigo
364train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

389Matches
51%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
88.7ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8947%1.3019.0
Inferno8655%1.3919.7
Anubis5754%1.1817.3
Ancient5066%1.2018.6
Dust24943%1.2217.4
Train2236%1.7816.8
Nuke2250%1.3821.4
Vertigo1250%1.6520.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
565msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
66.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
4.96HE damage / grenade
6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6871% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4542 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7177% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0414%29 Aug
mirage13–20.0514%29 Aug
dust28–130.0819%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0510%29 Aug
cache8–130.0413%28 Aug
dust213–70.0313%27 Aug
dust26–13-0.0113%27 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0415%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0310%26 Aug
nuke13–50.0814%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0123%26 Aug
inferno13–11-0.018%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0520%21 Aug
inferno13–100.059%21 Aug
dust213–100.029%21 Aug
cache13–110.0618%20 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0216%20 Aug
ancient11–130.0714%18 Aug
dust213–40.0914%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.0214%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0316%11 Aug
dust213–90.0519%8 Aug
inferno13–110.0610%8 Aug
cache13–60.0412%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0316%8 Aug
cache14–160.0913%8 Aug
dust216–120.0517%8 Aug
inferno9–130.1125%7 Aug
mirage13–110.0318%3 Aug
dust211–130.0116%1 Aug
cache11–130.0018%1 Aug
anubis13–90.089%1 Aug
ancient4–130.008%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0417%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0712%1 Aug
cache13–9-0.0213%31 Jul
mirage15–150.0113%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.057%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0211%28 Jul
anubis11–130.0210%28 Jul
cache13–10.1413%28 Jul
dust213–70.0815%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0613%27 Jul
cache6–130.0013%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0311%26 Jul
mirage13–30.1624%26 Jul
dust28–130.0013%26 Jul
cache13–110.0612%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0111%25 Jul
dust213–00.0712%25 Jul
cache6–13-0.0412%25 Jul
nuke13–60.0810%25 Jul
cache2–13-0.0021%25 Jul
dust213–7-0.0113%24 Jul
ancient13–60.0416%24 Jul
mirage10–130.0110%23 Jul
cache12–160.0113%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0914%23 Jul
inferno13–70.0919%23 Jul
mirage13–60.0621%22 Jul
inferno5–130.038%22 Jul
cache13–100.0711%22 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0421%22 Jul
cache16–120.0318%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0617%17 Jul
cache10–130.0317%17 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0316%16 Jul
dust213–80.0219%16 Jul
inferno15–150.0314%16 Jul
ancient13–100.0713%15 Jul
cache13–100.0516%15 Jul
anubis11–13-0.039%15 Jul
cache6–130.0518%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0421%13 Jul
inferno13–40.0727%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.0310%12 Jul
cache13–100.0713%12 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0416%12 Jul
cache3–130.0017%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0423%11 Jul
mirage16–140.0711%10 Jul
cache16–140.0217%10 Jul
inferno10–130.0416%9 Jul
cache13–90.0912%9 Jul
inferno4–130.0019%9 Jul
inferno13–20.0820%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0017%8 Jul
cache13–30.087%8 Jul
cache13–110.017%7 Jul
cache13–90.0315%7 Jul
anubis15–150.0412%6 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0318%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0222%5 Jul
dust213–80.0018%5 Jul
inferno15–150.0913%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0414%29 Jun
inferno4–13-0.039%29 Jun
inferno13–40.1722%29 Jun
mirage13–60.0311%27 Jun
inferno13–80.028%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →