Toaster — CS2 Stats
76561199092157272[U:1:1131891544]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Light Blue band median | Blue band median | vs Blue band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 53.6% | 40.1% | 41.7% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 7.6% | 8.8% | 8.8% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.02 short |
| Match win rate | 43.2% | 42.2% | 43.8% | meets |
This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 79% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 35 | 11–24 | 31% | 0.02 | |
| B | 13 | 6–7 | 46% | 0.03 | |
| D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | 0.00 | |
| poseidon | D | 12 | 4–8 | 33% | 0.02 |
| C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | 0.04 | |
| fachwerk | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.03 |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | 0.00 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.01 | |
| debris | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3197 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
31% win rate across 35 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9–5 | 0.09 | 18% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.10 | 18% | 29 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.04 | 32% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 23% | 26 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 1–9 | -0.20 | 38% | 25 Aug → | |
| 8–8 | -0.00 | 33% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.20 | 30% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.19 | 26% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.00 | 30% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 23% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.02 | 30% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 1–3 | 0.12 | 43% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 21% | 18 Aug → | ||
| fachwerk | 6–13 | 0.02 | 31% | 18 Aug → | |
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 12% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 23% | 17 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 9–5 | 0.10 | 53% | 17 Aug → | |
| poseidon | 7–9 | 0.01 | 12% | 17 Aug → | |
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 25% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 17% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.08 | 15% | 15 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 8–8 | 0.07 | 21% | 15 Aug → | |
| 8–8 | -0.02 | 25% | 15 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 5–9 | -0.01 | 13% | 15 Aug → | |
| 6–9 | -0.01 | 26% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 20% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 27% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 31% | 14 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 6–9 | 0.01 | 31% | 14 Aug → | |
| 9–6 | 0.08 | 42% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.07 | 36% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 31% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 27% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 33% | 11 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 5–9 | -0.10 | 17% | 11 Aug → | |
| 1–9 | 0.14 | 0% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 4–9 | -0.09 | 8% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 3–9 | -0.15 | 31% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.06 | 15% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.07 | 31% | 10 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 9–7 | 0.05 | 23% | 10 Aug → | |
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 30% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.04 | 23% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.06 | 24% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 21% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.12 | 23% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.08 | 10% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.05 | 13% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.00 | 13% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | -0.03 | 31% | 9 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 9–5 | 0.13 | 22% | 7 Aug → | |
| 4–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.23 | 19% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | -0.01 | 30% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 29% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.01 | 23% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | 0.35 | 27% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | -0.01 | 12% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.09 | 27% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.02 | 62% | 2 Aug → | ||
| poseidon | 5–9 | -0.08 | 21% | 30 Jul → | |
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 10% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.01 | 16% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.08 | 33% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 38% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 25% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 25% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 13% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.08 | 10% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.01 | 28% | 27 Jul → | ||
| poseidon | 9–2 | 0.31 | 35% | 27 Jul → | |
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 2–9 | 0.10 | 21% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 5–9 | -0.10 | 32% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 3–9 | -0.02 | 30% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 3–9 | -0.05 | 45% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.13 | 8% | 24 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 24% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 6–9 | -0.02 | 20% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.06 | 20% | 20 Jul → | ||
| fachwerk | 5–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 17 Jul → | |
| fachwerk | 13–10 | 0.11 | 24% | 17 Jul → | |
| debris | 9–6 | 0.20 | 13% | 17 Jul → | |
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 33% | 16 Jul → | ||
| fachwerk | 13–3 | 0.02 | 23% | 14 Jul → | |
| 5–9 | -0.08 | 21% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 9–3 | 0.27 | 23% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 4–9 | -0.09 | 8% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 9–1 | 0.05 | 44% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.12 | 23% | 11 Jul → | ||
| debris | 1–9 | -0.13 | 18% | 11 Jul → | |
| debris | 8–8 | -0.11 | 29% | 11 Jul → | |
| 4–9 | -0.01 | 28% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 10 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 17% | 10 Jul → | ||
| poseidon | 4–9 | -0.07 | 30% | 9 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.