Llama — CS2 Stats

76561199091504011[U:1:1131238283]

2,504Tracked matches56%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,670Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating15,403Purple band · top ~26.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16077 of 26055 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate40.2%42.1%42.1%1.9% short
Shot accuracy5.1%12.9%12.1%7.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.000.99meets
Match win rate43.6%42.9%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLlamaFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER15,403 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning44
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51409Last 10051%Win rateTLTLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression4.7
Utility5.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact6.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time571ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — office 12–12
132Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB20101050%0.01
infernoB168850%0.03
cacheB157847%0.03
nukeB157847%0.03
dust2B105550%0.03
officeS96367%0.02
anubisD72529%0.01
train220100%0.08
ancient21150%0.00
overpass21150%0.05
italy110100%0.10
vertigo110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,216Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
3,202Matches
43.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
40.2%Headshot %
5.1%Shot accuracy
6,018MVPs
1,276Hours (in match)
4,203Bombs planted
1,107Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,209
AWP4,432
MAC-103,292
XM10141,699
SSG 081,487
MP91,434

Lifetime map wins

5,331inferno
3,550nuke
2,068vertigo
2,014dust2
1,036train
397office
25italy
11ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
568msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
9.82HE damage / grenade
8.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5366% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–120.0021%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.038%21 Aug
cache15–150.0812%20 Aug
anubis5–130.0014%20 Aug
cache13–40.0318%20 Aug
nuke13–70.1146%19 Aug
dust211–130.0121%19 Aug
office13–11-0.018%18 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0016%18 Aug
dust28–130.0117%18 Aug
office8–13-0.018%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0015%16 Aug
cache5–13-0.0222%16 Aug
nuke13–60.0710%14 Aug
cache3–130.0211%14 Aug
mirage16–130.0619%13 Aug
italy13–60.1015%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0520%13 Aug
train13–80.1222%13 Aug
nuke3–130.0222%13 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0512%13 Aug
anubis1–13-0.049%12 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0612%12 Aug
mirage8–130.0118%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0133%12 Aug
train13–90.0320%12 Aug
office12–120.1316%12 Aug
vertigo13–60.1017%12 Aug
dust211–10.079%12 Aug
nuke13–100.0512%11 Aug
inferno0–110.0015%11 Aug
office13–70.0025%11 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0423%11 Aug
cache3–130.0539%11 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0516%11 Aug
dust213–50.0828%11 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0112%9 Aug
cache5–130.0028%9 Aug
dust211–130.1018%9 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0119%9 Aug
cache13–80.0318%9 Aug
nuke8–80.0918%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0816%9 Aug
mirage13–40.0119%8 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0915%8 Aug
cache14–16-0.058%8 Aug
inferno8–130.0017%8 Aug
nuke13–50.094%8 Aug
office13–9-0.045%29 Jul
office12–120.0419%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0311%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0317%28 Jul
dust212–12-0.0310%28 Jul
inferno13–80.0718%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0413%25 Jul
cache13–110.0115%24 Jul
anubis15–150.0512%24 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0816%21 Jul
office13–70.035%21 Jul
inferno5–130.0217%21 Jul
anubis13–100.0820%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%20 Jul
mirage7–130.019%20 Jul
mirage13–90.069%16 Jul
inferno13–70.0819%16 Jul
cache13–90.1118%16 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0218%15 Jul
cache13–110.0714%14 Jul
nuke10–130.0222%14 Jul
cache16–130.0413%14 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0422%14 Jul
mirage15–150.0215%14 Jul
cache13–80.0715%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0120%14 Jul
mirage11–130.0610%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0210%13 Jul
nuke5–130.046%13 Jul
inferno9–130.0314%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0718%9 Jul
office13–110.0612%9 Jul
dust213–90.0314%9 Jul
overpass11–130.0321%8 Jul
office13–8-0.0122%8 Jul
inferno13–50.0710%8 Jul
mirage13–80.039%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0318%3 Jul
inferno9–130.0125%3 Jul
mirage7–20.0121%3 Jul
inferno9–70.0830%2 Jul
nuke13–110.0823%2 Jul
cache7–130.0522%1 Jul
overpass13–80.0721%1 Jul
dust213–20.0427%30 Jun
nuke9–130.0327%30 Jun
inferno13–90.0237%29 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0719%29 Jun
cache6–130.0013%29 Jun
dust213–11-0.0020%29 Jun
mirage8–130.0017%29 Jun
inferno11–130.0712%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →