A Cold Crisp Can of Dr. Pepper

A Cold Crisp Can of Dr. Pepper — CS2 Stats

76561199066384077[U:1:1106118349]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

861Tracked matches22%Win rate2023Tracked since
737Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.9 Learning
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.8%42.5%44.2%above
Shot accuracy3.7%10.9%11.2%7.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.590.991.040.45 short
Match win rate39.4%44.2%45.3%5.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGA Cold Crisp Can of Dr. P…FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning32
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40528Last 10040%Win rateLLWWLLTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.3
Aggression1.8
Utility2.0
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 714ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning3.2
Utility2.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time709ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 732ms → last ⅓ avg 709ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — ancient 13–9
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2381535%-0.04
cacheC2391439%-0.04
dust2C135838%-0.03
anubisD81713%-0.01
infernoD72529%-0.04
nukeS75271%-0.02
ancientC52340%-0.01
vertigo41325%-0.08
overpass21150%-0.01
fachwerk220100%-0.08
train220100%-0.02
boulder1010%-0.08
stronghold1010%-0.06
warden110100%-0.03
office110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,636Lifetime kills
0.59K/D
1,124Matches
39.4%Match win rate
45.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
3.7%Shot accuracy
1,455MVPs
373Hours (in match)
1,087Bombs planted
145Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,658dust2
856nuke
748inferno
297train
246vertigo
73office
2ar_baggage
2lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches
47%Win rate
0.56Avg K/D
46.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

8%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2157%0.598.3
Nuke875%0.6811.5
Dust2812%0.407.6
Anubis540%0.417.6
Cache580%0.8410.0
Ancient20%0.488.0
Inferno20%0.457.5
Vertigo10%0.479.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
714msReaction time
13.6%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
6.70HE damage / grenade
1.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 714.1877ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.481 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.5522% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.079%19 Aug
ancient3–13-0.018%19 Aug
ancient13–20.0016%5 Aug
vertigo13–3-0.0722%5 Aug
cache3–13-0.0430%5 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0726%5 Aug
dust212–12-0.0332%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0912%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0410%26 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0222%26 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0425%23 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0717%23 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.0916%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0716%20 Jul
cache8–13-0.0914%20 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0910%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.099%16 Jul
cache3–13-0.1111%16 Jul
dust213–7-0.0620%16 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0711%16 Jul
anubis8–130.0121%15 Jul
mirage7–1-0.0325%15 Jul
inferno4–13-0.056%15 Jul
anubis6–130.0126%15 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0322%15 Jul
dust27–130.0518%14 Jul
dust212–12-0.049%14 Jul
cache12–12-0.0415%13 Jul
mirage7–130.0013%13 Jul
nuke1–13-0.1115%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.1017%12 Jul
train13–9-0.0218%12 Jul
mirage8–1-0.0622%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0919%12 Jul
dust213–90.0216%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0513%11 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0710%9 Jul
fachwerk13–11-0.075%9 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0810%9 Jul
cache13–7-0.029%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.029%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0711%8 Jul
cache13–2-0.0721%8 Jul
stronghold8–13-0.069%7 Jul
warden13–6-0.0317%7 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0419%5 Jul
overpass13–70.0614%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0710%2 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0611%1 Jul
anubis13–100.0816%1 Jul
cache8–13-0.0414%1 Jul
inferno13–70.0210%1 Jul
mirage8–13-0.059%29 Jun
cache7–130.0110%23 Jun
dust26–13-0.0419%19 Jun
inferno8–13-0.1015%18 Jun
dust213–7-0.0811%14 Jun
cache11–13-0.0523%13 Jun
cache9–13-0.0616%12 Jun
cache13–10-0.0328%10 Jun
mirage2–13-0.078%10 Jun
cache12–120.0217%10 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.108%10 Jun
nuke6–130.0326%9 Jun
ancient13–90.0814%9 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0216%9 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0115%9 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0731%9 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0321%9 Jun
dust213–60.0213%8 Jun
nuke13–70.0511%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0517%7 Jun
anubis5–130.0119%6 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0712%4 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0414%4 Jun
mirage12–12-0.089%3 Jun
cache10–13-0.0910%3 Jun
dust29–13-0.0520%3 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0515%1 Jun
cache13–4-0.095%28 May
mirage6–13-0.0711%28 May
cache7–13-0.0517%28 May
mirage13–80.0132%28 May
vertigo1–13-0.1027%26 May
mirage13–30.0424%26 May
cache13–30.0615%26 May
dust213–60.0122%26 May
mirage13–100.0529%25 May
cache13–11-0.0022%24 May
inferno8–13-0.020%23 May
cache7–13-0.0218%20 May
cache13–11-0.0324%20 May
nuke13–9-0.0111%19 May
cache13–50.0027%18 May
cache13–11-0.0525%14 May
ancient12–12-0.0327%14 May
train13–2-0.0237%14 May
cache2–13-0.1330%14 May
office13–2-0.0060%13 May
mirage4–13-0.0321%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →