insomniac — CS2 Stats
76561199065370136[U:1:1105104408]
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Excellent counter-strafing
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 20 | 8–12 | 40% | 0.00 | |
| B | 19 | 9–10 | 47% | 0.01 | |
| B | 15 | 8–7 | 53% | -0.01 | |
| A | 14 | 8–6 | 57% | 0.02 | |
| A | 12 | 7–5 | 58% | 0.00 | |
| A | 11 | 6–5 | 55% | 0.01 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.02 | |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.03 |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 65 | 54% | 1.16 | 15.2 |
| Nuke | 37 | 57% | 1.16 | 17.5 |
| Dust2 | 36 | 42% | 1.12 | 17.8 |
| Inferno | 32 | 50% | 1.09 | 14.6 |
| Ancient | 21 | 33% | 1.00 | 15.2 |
| Overpass | 18 | 50% | 1.13 | 17.2 |
| Anubis | 9 | 33% | 1.01 | 13.7 |
| Cache | 7 | 29% | 1.34 | 18.6 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4978 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.36% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14–16 | 0.06 | 25% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 24% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 17% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.01 | 15% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 25% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.05 | 19% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.05 | 13% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.12 | 22% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 12% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.00 | 24% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 21% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 13% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 2–8 | 0.09 | 24% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 38% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 19% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.08 | 35% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 14% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 18% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.07 | 25% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 13% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.02 | 8% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.04 | 22% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.06 | 23% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.04 | 12% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 17% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 17% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 3 Aug → | ||
| office | 13–5 | 0.03 | 17% | 31 Jul → | |
| 13–4 | -0.03 | 17% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 22% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 19% | 30 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.08 | 15% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.04 | 23% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 17% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 18% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 16% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.00 | 13% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 28% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.07 | 33% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 15% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.08 | 9% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.00 | 17% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 21% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.08 | 12% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 7% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 12% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 10% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.05 | 9% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.11 | 18% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.07 | 11% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 27% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 29% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 29% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.12 | 21% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 15% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.06 | 11% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 3–8 | -0.07 | 13% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 25% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 13% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.06 | 50% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 25% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.00 | 15% | 12 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.02 | 24% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 7% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 10% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 25% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 22% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 16–12 | -0.03 | 15% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.09 | 24% | 2 Jul → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.06 | 17% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 15% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.01 | 24% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.09 | 15% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 7% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.01 | 21% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 19% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.09 | 20% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.00 | 18% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 27 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 16% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 17% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 14% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.06 | 11% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 12–9 | 0.06 | 21% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 23% | 24 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.