Lisus — CS2 Stats

76561199038760286[U:1:1078494558]✓ No bans

2,036Tracked matches67%Win rate2022Tracked since

1,287Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating25,120Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3802 of 31698 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 991 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

25,120Peak Premier on CSDB

991Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 991
Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 60 to go
Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
Level 4 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 3 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 25,120
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,880 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	32.8%	44.2%	44.9%	12.1% short
Shot accuracy	10.2%	11.2%	11.8%	1.6% short
Kill/death ratio	0.86	1.04	1.04	0.18 short
Match win rate	58.6%	45.3%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning15

Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT74–25–1Last 10074%Win rateWWWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.11 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression0.0

Utility2.5

Positioning1.5

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning1.5

Utility2.5

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.05

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time430ms−254ms

first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 430ms

Headshot accuracy13.1%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–0Biggest win — dust2

18Longest win streak

W5Current streak

3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 86% over 14infernoWeakest map · 62% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	32	23–9	72%	-0.01
mirage	S	15	12–3	80%	0.03
ancient	S	14	12–2	86%	-0.01
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	0.04
cache	S	13	11–2	85%	0.01
nuke	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (62% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,749Lifetime kills

0.86K/D

5,315Matches

58.6%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players

32.8%Headshot %

10.2%Shot accuracy

10,213MVPs

1,287Hours (in match)

2,615Bombs planted

593Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,789

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,872

AWP4,977

P2000 / USP-S3,570

Glock-182,866

P902,338

MP92,298

Galil AR2,028

AUG1,827

Desert Eagle1,459

Lifetime map wins

3,555dust2

3,256inferno

2,540nuke

2,105vertigo

1,276cbble

748train

21office

19lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

522Matches

49%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

82.4ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	174	51%	0.99	15.3
Dust2	70	44%	0.95	14.4
Ancient	65	49%	1.06	15.6
Inferno	53	55%	0.97	15.2
Nuke	42	52%	1.08	16.3
Anubis	30	47%	0.96	14.5
Vertigo	26	38%	1.09	15.3
Overpass	12	42%	0.89	13.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.6%Headshot accuracy

25.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.0%Spray accuracy

71.0%Counter-strafing

6.6°Preaim

443msReaction time

13.0%T opening success

14.8%CT opening success

0.30Enemies flashed / flash

12.6%Flash assists

9.06HE damage / grenade

1.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.561% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2968 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 12.9584% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–1	0.29	22%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–3	0.26	20%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.27	20%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–5	0.07	20%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	13%	3 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	7%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	15%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.13	19%	26 Jul →
cache	2–4	0.07	8%	25 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	25%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	22%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.07	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	5–0	0.11	63%	23 Jul →
mirage	0–7	0.04	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.02	25%	23 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	19%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	33%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	33%	21 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.05	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	0%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.00	0%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.00	0%	21 Jul →
cache	7–0	0.00	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.01	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.02	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	2–3	-0.10	0%	20 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	0%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.05	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	12–0	0.00	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.12	4%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–0	-0.00	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	0–3	-0.09	0%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–0	0.00	0%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.01	0%	18 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	100%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	100%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.01	0%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–1	-0.01	0%	18 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.01	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	0%	18 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.04	0%	18 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–0	0.00	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	11%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.16	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.18	29%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	9%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	0%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	0%	17 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.00	38%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.00	5%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	16 Jul →
ancient	2–0	0.00	0%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.10	17%	16 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.00	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.19	19%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.08	10%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.09	5%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.01	30%	15 Jul →
cache	4–0	-0.05	0%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.01	5%	15 Jul →
dust2	4–0	0.03	20%	15 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	11%	15 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	5%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.03	25%	14 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.00	7%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.01	24%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	33%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–1	-0.01	5%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–1	-0.01	10%	14 Jul →
ancient	2–0	0.00	0%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.02	6%	14 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	22%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.07	28%	14 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.02	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.04	7%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	12%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.05	19%	8 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.09	8%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.06	14%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	13%	30 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	13%	28 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.02	13%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	13%	25 Jun →
nuke	2–9	-0.13	8%	24 Jun →
nuke	3–9	-0.06	13%	24 Jun →
inferno	5–0	-0.04	10%	24 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	7%	24 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.11	13%	24 Jun →
inferno	7–9	-0.12	3%	23 Jun →
inferno	9–6	-0.07	3%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.02	10%	23 Jun →