walking on a dream — CS2 Stats

PL76561198292574099[U:1:332308371]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

187Tracked matches41%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,454Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#992 of 33341 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

27,454Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 27,454
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,546 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning26

Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY67–32–1Last 10067%Win rateWLWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8

Aggression2.8

Utility3.0

Positioning2.6

Opening Duels0.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 62 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning2.6

Utility3.0

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time421ms+70ms

first ⅓ avg 352ms → last ⅓ avg 421ms

Headshot accuracy22.0%+1.9%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.47Best rating — inferno 9–0

13–0Biggest win — cache

15Longest win streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 79% over 14infernoWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	33	22–11	67%	-0.02
mirage	A	25	15–10	60%	-0.00
ancient	S	14	11–3	79%	0.01
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.03
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.07
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
poseidon	—	2	2–0	100%	0.00
debris	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
office	—	2	2–0	100%	0.08
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.5%Headshot accuracy

34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.7%Spray accuracy

80.4%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

531msReaction time

28.5%T opening success

18.2%CT opening success

0.31Enemies flashed / flash

1.6%Flash assists

12.46HE damage / grenade

4.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3077 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.4812% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–0	0.14	25%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	17%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.10	29%	20 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.02	43%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	33%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.02	28%	19 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	47%	19 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.05	25%	14 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	3–9	0.00	0%	13 Aug →
mirage	1–9	-0.06	100%	13 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.02	50%	13 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	17%	13 Aug →
ancient	5–0	-0.05	46%	13 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	21%	13 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.00	25%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.05	50%	13 Aug →
mirage	0–2	-0.01	0%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.04	14%	13 Aug →
nuke	0–2	-0.03	0%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.05	7%	13 Aug →
cache	0–2	-0.09	0%	13 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.00	0%	13 Aug →
shelter	13–9	0.12	28%	12 Aug →
cache	0–2	0.00	0%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	0%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.01	47%	23 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.05	0%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.00	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–0	-0.04	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.05	0%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	21 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.09	33%	20 Jul →
inferno	9–0	0.47	75%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.14	57%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.01	100%	20 Jul →
dust2	3–6	-0.06	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.09	0%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	100%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.09	10%	20 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.10	0%	18 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
poseidon	9–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
debris	9–0	0.00	0%	18 Jul →
debris	9–0	0.07	14%	18 Jul →
poseidon	9–0	0.00	0%	17 Jul →
dust2	3–0	-0.01	0%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–0	-0.01	0%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.00	67%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–0	-0.01	100%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.00	100%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.01	67%	16 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.01	57%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–1	-0.04	29%	11 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.01	5%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	25%	11 Jul →
cache	13–0	-0.00	43%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.02	36%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.01	9%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.04	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.13	36%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.09	26%	9 Jul →
office	13–2	0.12	26%	8 Jul →
office	13–2	0.04	18%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.10	28%	3 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	9%	1 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.10	15%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.04	20%	30 Jun →
dust2	0–13	0.00	0%	27 Jun →
dust2	0–13	0.00	0%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–0	0.00	40%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.02	38%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	15%	27 Jun →
dust2	0–6	-0.06	0%	26 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	0%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	26 Jun →
dust2	6–0	0.00	0%	26 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	100%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.00	0%	24 Jun →
mirage	0–3	0.00	0%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–0	-0.01	10%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–0	-0.01	67%	24 Jun →
dust2	2–0	0.00	0%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–0	0.00	50%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.05	15%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–1	0.11	27%	24 Jun →
dust2	0–2	0.00	0%	24 Jun →
dust2	0–3	-0.07	0%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.00	33%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–0	0.00	0%	23 Jun →
inferno	4–4	0.05	21%	23 Jun →
dust2	2–0	0.00	0%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–0	0.00	38%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–0	0.07	86%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.04	6%	22 Jun →