OneTap — CS2 Stats

76561199028837073[U:1:1068571345]Steam profile ↗2 game bans

261Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since

454Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,588Purple band · top ~18.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13058 of 24016 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	62.4%	42.1%	42.1%	above
Shot accuracy	10.7%	12.9%	12.1%	1.4% short
Kill/death ratio	1.12	1.00	0.99	above
Match win rate	42.9%	42.9%	43.9%	1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning52

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateTLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0

Aggression6.2

Utility5.1

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 760ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.2

Utility5.1

Mechanics8.9

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time766ms+22ms

first ⅓ avg 744ms → last ⅓ avg 766ms

Headshot accuracy43.0%+8.8%

first ⅓ avg 34.2% → last ⅓ avg 43.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–3Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

13–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 42% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	29	13–16	45%	0.02
mirage	C	19	8–11	42%	0.01
nuke	B	18	9–9	50%	0.04
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.02
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.00
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	0.00
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,514Lifetime kills

1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players

672Matches

42.9%Match win rate

62.4%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 2 players

10.7%Shot accuracy

1,355MVPs

208Hours (in match)

559Bombs planted

144Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-474,467

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,022

Desert Eagle1,044

AWP811

P2000 / USP-S494

Glock-18364

Galil AR185

MP9158

SSG 08157

MAC-10102

Lifetime map wins

1,899dust2

823inferno

610nuke

180vertigo

66train

65cbble

48lake

4office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches

42%Win rate

0.73Avg K/D

—ADR

58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

40.9%Headshot accuracy

36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.3%Spray accuracy

89.9%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

760msReaction time

28.4%T opening success

48.8%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

5.94HE damage / grenade

17.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 759.5873ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.4392% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	15–15	-0.00	33%	28 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	44%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	45%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–6	-0.06	100%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	53%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	50%	25 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	29%	17 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	20%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	61%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	50%	10 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.09	45%	9 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	54%	9 Aug →
nuke	7–1	0.08	54%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	29%	8 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	37%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	46%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.09	38%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	38%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	26%	5 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	38%	5 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	39%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	40%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	44%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	43%	3 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	37%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.06	42%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.06	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	52%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–16	0.03	38%	27 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	35%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	37%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.12	55%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	34%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.03	38%	26 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	38%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	34%	26 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.08	42%	26 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.06	51%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	44%	26 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	28%	26 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	45%	25 Jul →
nuke	2–13	0.07	30%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.06	55%	25 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.04	43%	25 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.03	39%	25 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.12	35%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.07	32%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.12	32%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.08	37%	24 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.08	31%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	21%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.01	25%	24 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.04	38%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	52%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.10	36%	24 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.01	30%	24 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.05	52%	23 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.02	46%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.10	56%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.06	40%	23 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	30%	22 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	35%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.04	30%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.04	30%	20 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	42%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	26%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.05	39%	20 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	18%	19 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.00	32%	19 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	44%	19 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	45%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.17	40%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.10	35%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	40%	18 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.05	33%	14 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	36%	14 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	33%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	40%	14 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.10	39%	13 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.01	34%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	24%	12 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	50%	10 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.03	23%	8 Jul →
dust2	2–9	0.01	54%	3 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	46%	22 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	34%	10 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	26%	7 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	25%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.05	41%	1 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.06	31%	31 May →
nuke	9–13	0.04	49%	29 May →
mirage	13–3	0.08	33%	29 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	35%	28 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	23%	28 May →
overpass	13–10	0.01	36%	25 May →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	19%	25 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	27%	25 May →
nuke	7–13	0.04	15%	25 May →