samcukier

samcukier — CS2 Stats

PL76561199025678236[U:1:1065412508]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

444Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,093Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating22,874Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5040 of 18752 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,076 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsamcukierFACEITLevel 7 · 1,076 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,874 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning43
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression6.2
Utility4.1
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch5.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.3
Utility4.1
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time584ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 9–3
130Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6nukeWeakest map · 38% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC32122038%0.01
mirageA2415963%0.04
infernoA127558%-0.01
cacheC104640%-0.02
ancientB84450%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.02
dust2S65183%-0.00
shelter110100%-0.01
office1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,832Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
1,771Matches
42.4%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
4,614MVPs
556Hours (in match)
1,932Bombs planted
235Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,685nuke
1,428inferno
909dust2
527vertigo
515train
457lake
406cbble
106office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

97Matches
56%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
81.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2665%1.1015.4
Dust21669%1.0517.6
Nuke1540%0.8614.0
Inferno1164%0.9917.1
Cache1050%1.0715.3
Ancient956%1.0517.3
Anubis838%0.9416.0
Vertigo10%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
67.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
568msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.14HE damage / grenade
6.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4558 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5371% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–130.0327%25 Aug
cache6–13-0.0421%25 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0421%25 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0327%24 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0326%18 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0410%17 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0827%12 Aug
ancient13–100.0317%12 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0431%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.108%8 Aug
dust28–00.0617%5 Aug
mirage9–130.0813%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0718%4 Aug
nuke9–40.0612%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0018%4 Aug
cache4–130.0512%3 Aug
inferno13–90.0215%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0123%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0412%3 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0027%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0913%3 Aug
shelter13–11-0.0113%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0228%1 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0127%1 Aug
nuke11–130.1013%1 Aug
mirage13–20.088%1 Aug
inferno13–30.0527%31 Jul
nuke1–9-0.1914%29 Jul
nuke9–30.098%29 Jul
inferno3–80.0223%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0012%29 Jul
nuke8–130.0225%29 Jul
nuke6–130.0222%28 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0133%27 Jul
nuke12–120.0434%27 Jul
nuke9–70.1530%26 Jul
nuke5–9-0.056%26 Jul
nuke7–90.0816%26 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0910%26 Jul
nuke9–30.2227%23 Jul
nuke8–80.006%23 Jul
nuke8–80.077%23 Jul
inferno8–130.0015%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0116%23 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0210%23 Jul
cache13–3-0.0414%23 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0414%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0112%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0117%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0423%22 Jul
nuke9–7-0.0230%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0324%22 Jul
cache5–13-0.0424%22 Jul
mirage13–40.1520%22 Jul
mirage9–10.0640%21 Jul
nuke9–6-0.0119%21 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0217%21 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0225%21 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0518%21 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0627%20 Jul
inferno8–80.0316%20 Jul
ancient4–13-0.016%20 Jul
inferno9–7-0.1026%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0414%20 Jul
cache13–4-0.0215%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0428%19 Jul
cache13–90.0919%19 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0118%19 Jul
inferno13–40.0217%18 Jul
anubis13–00.0565%18 Jul
cache13–00.0615%18 Jul
mirage13–70.1756%18 Jul
mirage7–130.0115%16 Jul
nuke2–9-0.1836%16 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0025%16 Jul
nuke13–40.1029%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0213%16 Jul
mirage13–40.2033%16 Jul
mirage13–80.1519%16 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0828%16 Jul
mirage13–40.1824%15 Jul
office8–13-0.086%15 Jul
mirage13–10.0414%15 Jul
nuke13–20.008%15 Jul
dust213–10-0.0615%15 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0526%15 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0117%14 Jul
ancient2–130.0312%14 Jul
nuke7–130.0320%14 Jul
inferno9–60.0013%14 Jul
nuke9–30.1922%14 Jul
mirage13–8-0.007%14 Jul
cache3–13-0.1512%14 Jul
nuke7–9-0.1116%14 Jul
anubis16–13-0.067%13 Jul
dust213–30.0216%13 Jul
cache6–13-0.066%13 Jul
anubis13–50.038%13 Jul
mirage13–00.0923%13 Jul
dust213–90.0329%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →