xoskk

xoskk — CS2 Stats

BA76561199024511920[U:1:1064246192]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

840Tracked matches44%Win rate2024Tracked since
971Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,937Purple band · top ~20.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19885 of 36409 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,178 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate58.8%44.2%44.9%above
Shot accuracy0.1%11.2%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.041.04above
Match win rate49.2%45.3%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxoskkFACEITLevel 5 · 1,178 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,937 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning68
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT454411Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression10.0
Utility3.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact3.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time624ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 29.6% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 52% over 23nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C32141844%0.02
infernoB23121152%0.04
ancientC167944%0.04
mirageB157847%0.03
nukeD123925%0.02
anubis110100%-0.00
overpass110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,727Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
1,290Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
58.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
4,756MVPs
552Hours (in match)
893Bombs planted
413Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,508
AWP3,679
MP9825
Knife295

Lifetime map wins

2,749inferno
2,648dust2
870nuke
190vertigo
164train
53office
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

152Matches
49%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
87.7ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6554%1.3118.0
Inferno3250%1.4117.0
Ancient1942%1.2915.2
Dust21553%1.1918.3
Nuke1118%1.1519.4
Anubis580%1.1312.2
Vertigo20%0.6410.0
Overpass250%1.0614.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
635msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
67.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
7.01HE damage / grenade
3.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2601 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8968% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0723%29 Aug
inferno13–80.0544%24 Apr
dust213–30.1148%24 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0550%23 Apr
dust213–40.0125%23 Apr
inferno13–20.0746%23 Apr
dust213–30.0721%22 Apr
ancient7–130.0145%18 Apr
mirage13–40.0331%4 Apr
mirage13–70.0333%30 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0711%29 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0435%26 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0433%26 Mar
ancient12–120.0323%26 Mar
dust29–13-0.0223%25 Mar
mirage9–130.0731%25 Mar
nuke7–130.1330%23 Mar
inferno12–120.0132%23 Mar
nuke13–100.0745%22 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0020%21 Mar
mirage10–130.0728%19 Mar
ancient7–13-0.069%17 Mar
dust27–130.0031%17 Mar
dust24–13-0.0727%17 Mar
ancient13–90.0233%17 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0726%17 Mar
ancient12–120.0326%16 Mar
ancient13–20.1635%16 Mar
overpass13–30.0716%15 Mar
dust27–13-0.0229%14 Mar
inferno13–70.1218%14 Mar
mirage11–130.0129%14 Mar
ancient13–40.1119%14 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0317%14 Mar
dust211–130.1123%14 Mar
mirage13–30.1525%13 Mar
mirage13–60.1136%12 Mar
dust26–130.0233%12 Mar
mirage10–130.0133%11 Mar
dust213–100.0433%11 Mar
ancient13–50.1132%11 Mar
inferno13–100.0230%9 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0117%9 Mar
dust213–9-0.0117%9 Mar
dust213–5-0.0335%9 Mar
ancient13–90.0316%9 Mar
nuke20–220.0524%8 Mar
dust213–70.0418%8 Mar
ancient13–110.0326%7 Mar
inferno13–70.1324%7 Mar
ancient13–70.1336%7 Mar
inferno9–130.0127%7 Mar
dust213–40.0720%7 Mar
dust213–60.0224%7 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0236%6 Mar
dust215–19-0.0032%5 Mar
dust28–130.0338%5 Mar
ancient0–7-0.050%5 Mar
nuke6–130.0134%3 Mar
dust212–120.0731%3 Mar
dust212–12-0.0326%3 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0425%3 Mar
inferno9–130.0227%2 Mar
inferno9–30.1013%28 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0342%28 Feb
inferno12–40.0621%28 Feb
inferno12–120.0732%28 Feb
ancient10–130.0434%28 Feb
dust213–50.1333%28 Feb
nuke10–130.0334%27 Feb
dust213–9-0.0332%27 Feb
ancient12–120.0619%27 Feb
inferno1–13-0.0524%27 Feb
dust212–120.0222%27 Feb
dust211–130.0033%26 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0519%26 Feb
nuke8–50.0133%26 Feb
dust213–3-0.0129%25 Feb
inferno13–00.1940%25 Feb
dust28–130.0124%25 Feb
dust29–130.0228%25 Feb
dust28–130.0224%24 Feb
inferno12–120.0428%24 Feb
mirage13–30.1324%24 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0224%24 Feb
nuke9–130.0027%24 Feb
inferno13–70.0420%24 Feb
dust213–90.0329%24 Feb
dust28–13-0.0225%24 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0337%24 Feb
mirage13–110.0122%23 Feb
dust213–50.0244%23 Feb
nuke12–120.0747%23 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0130%23 Feb
inferno13–80.0323%23 Feb
dust210–13-0.0221%23 Feb
inferno5–10.0764%23 Feb
inferno11–130.0524%22 Feb
nuke16–140.0223%22 Feb
dust212–120.0436%22 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →