sandpounder7 — CS2 Stats

TD76561199021260080[U:1:1060994352]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

906Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since

534Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating9,455Light Blue band · top ~57.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16985 of 22951 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	55.7%	42.5%	44.2%	above
Shot accuracy	5.3%	10.9%	11.2%	5.9% short
Kill/death ratio	1.09	0.99	1.04	above
Match win rate	46.9%	44.2%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning56

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression6.9

Utility5.1

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 94% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.6

Utility5.1

Mechanics9.7

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time637ms−81ms

first ⅓ avg 719ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms

Headshot accuracy23.5%−3.2%

first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–11

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

11–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	20	10–10	50%	0.03
nuke	S	19	13–6	68%	0.02
mirage	B	17	9–8	53%	0.02
dust2	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.00
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
inferno	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,302Lifetime kills

1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

1,311Matches

46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

55.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players

5.3%Shot accuracy

3,075MVPs

534Hours (in match)

1,034Bombs planted

366Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,694

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,602

AWP2,081

P2000 / USP-S1,553

Desert Eagle1,196

Glock-18917

MP9362

Tec-9301

P250251

XM1014221

Lifetime map wins

2,546dust2

1,732nuke

1,508inferno

711train

99vertigo

4italy

4office

3cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches

43%Win rate

0.65Avg K/D

75.4ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

40%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	50%	1.02	16.8
Inferno	1	100%	0.88	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy

38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.6%Spray accuracy

93.6%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

630msReaction time

43.2%T opening success

36.1%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

6.12HE damage / grenade

7.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 36.1166% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	8–13	0.02	29%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	16%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	9%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.11	20%	28 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.10	34%	27 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.02	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.05	25%	27 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	16%	27 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	22%	26 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.02	19%	26 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	23%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	16%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	22%	25 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.03	25%	25 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	26%	25 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	19%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	23%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	29%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	35%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.08	28%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	23%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	25%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.09	26%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	11%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	24%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.15	29%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	38%	28 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	23%	26 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	33%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.04	27%	12 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	28%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	30%	9 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.03	33%	8 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.01	31%	8 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	28%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	25%	5 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	33%	5 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.03	30%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	16%	5 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	33%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–4	-0.05	37%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	31%	3 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.04	28%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	20%	2 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.06	23%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	17%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.17	13%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	28%	30 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	21%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.09	26%	28 Jun →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	22%	28 Jun →
nuke	4–0	0.00	0%	28 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.06	34%	28 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	20%	28 Jun →
nuke	3–13	0.04	23%	28 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.01	42%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.09	22%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.02	26%	27 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	35%	27 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	33%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	27%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.00	25%	26 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.04	21%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	20%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–0	0.05	38%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.03	20%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	16%	23 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	25%	23 Jun →
ancient	1–5	0.12	40%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	17%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	27%	22 Jun →
mirage	0–12	-0.03	22%	21 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	28%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	21%	20 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	18%	20 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	27%	20 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.08	29%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.03	19%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	29%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	30%	19 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	34%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	37%	19 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.01	32%	19 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	23%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.05	23%	18 Jun →
anubis	16–13	0.01	19%	18 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.01	22%	15 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	27%	14 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.02	40%	14 Jun →
ancient	2–13	0.07	17%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.11	28%	14 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.05	37%	14 Jun →
overpass	6–13	0.03	44%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	21%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.08	30%	13 Jun →