leap — CS2 Stats

76561199003776359[U:1:1043510631]✓ No bans

1,211Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,857Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,787Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#504 of 18820 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,373 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	48.5%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	9.6%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.48	1.08
Match win rate	55.5%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning61

Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35–63–2Last 10035%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression10.0

Utility2.1

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels5.7

Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning6.1

Utility2.1

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels5.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.20−0.21

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.20

Reaction time225ms−256ms

first ⅓ avg 481ms → last ⅓ avg 225ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%−6.7%

first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–2Biggest win — mirage

12Longest win streak

L2Current streak

0–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 24infernoWeakest map · 0% over 28

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	D	28	0–28	0%	-0.22
mirage	C	25	11–14	44%	0.02
dust2	A	24	15–9	63%	0.02
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.11
train	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.19
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.24
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

94,905Lifetime kills

1.48K/D · Top 10% of Level 10 players

3,380Matches

55.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players

48.5%Headshot %

9.6%Shot accuracy

12,942MVPs

1,652Hours (in match)

1,692Bombs planted

912Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,958

Desert Eagle13,510

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,583

AWP11,225

P2000 / USP-S5,879

Glock-183,761

MP92,113

Knife2,039

Galil AR1,497

MAC-101,360

Lifetime map wins

5,826dust2

1,645inferno

1,394vertigo

1,232nuke

673train

218office

197italy

100aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

441Matches

60%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

92.7ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	133	62%	1.42	19.3
Dust2	73	56%	1.27	19.6
Ancient	41	68%	1.41	18.8
Anubis	28	50%	1.09	16.3
Nuke	15	53%	1.44	20.3
Train	10	50%	1.44	20.5
Overpass	8	50%	1.54	16.8
Vertigo	6	83%	1.62	14.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy

40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.4%Spray accuracy

76.2%Counter-strafing

7.4°Preaim

439msReaction time

42.9%T opening success

62.6%CT opening success

0.33Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

10.26HE damage / grenade

1.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3338 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	-0.05	23%	28 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	27%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	0–2	-0.00	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.13	50%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.22	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.25	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.24	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.27	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.29	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.16	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.19	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.29	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.26	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.18	100%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.24	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.12	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.23	63%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.28	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.22	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.17	100%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.21	100%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.26	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.28	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.23	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.13	57%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.23	0%	28 Aug →
nuke	0–9	-0.30	0%	28 Aug →
poseidon	0–9	-0.19	0%	28 Aug →
poseidon	0–9	-0.19	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.24	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.22	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.26	0%	28 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.16	0%	28 Aug →
debris	0–9	-0.24	0%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	24%	27 Aug →
dust2	9–5	0.06	34%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.05	25%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–0	0.06	18%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	12%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.13	38%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	25%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.06	23%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.10	11%	27 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.05	13%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	11%	26 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	21%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	39%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	20%	26 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	17%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	14%	25 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	23%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	14%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.08	25%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.11	16%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	20%	19 Aug →
inferno	0–4	-0.10	50%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	32%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.09	40%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.09	23%	17 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.00	28%	14 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.08	25%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	18%	12 Aug →
mirage	2–13	0.02	31%	12 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.05	26%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	15%	12 Aug →
train	12–12	-0.06	22%	12 Aug →
train	10–13	0.02	27%	12 Aug →
train	7–13	-0.04	22%	12 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	0%	9 Aug →
dust2	1–4	-0.03	25%	9 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	43%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	1–4	-0.07	33%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.09	44%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	19%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.06	38%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.07	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.09	30%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.30	26%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	23%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.11	33%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.10	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–1	0.05	8%	5 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.11	26%	5 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	40%	5 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	8%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	16%	5 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	0–3	-0.09	0%	5 Aug →
vertigo	1–13	-0.05	25%	30 Jul →
vertigo	6–2	0.07	7%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–3	0.00	55%	28 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	24%	28 Jul →