Rannger

Rannger — CS2 Stats

76561198992160168[U:1:1031894440]Steam profile ↗

1,248Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,283Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,249 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate76.0%44.7%46.1%above
Shot accuracy2.7%11.9%12.6%9.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.951.041.05above
Match win rate45.6%45.2%45.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRanngerFACEITLevel 6 · 1,249 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning58
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY453916Last 10045%Win rateWLWWLLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression6.6
Utility2.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.8
Utility2.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact8.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time564ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy33.5%+9.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 33.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.36Best rating — inferno 9–2
132Biggest win — nuke
3Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 37% over 38
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC38142437%0.01
nukeB24121250%0.05
mirageA138562%0.03
overpassA95456%0.05
anubisS64267%0.01
debris2020%-0.05
ancient21150%0.09
dust22020%0.00
eldorado1010%0.03
cache110100%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.07
sanctum1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 38). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,240Lifetime kills
1.95K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
2,025Matches
45.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
76.0%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 6 players
2.7%Shot accuracy
6,304MVPs
974Hours (in match)
1,625Bombs planted
1,106Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,968inferno
1,976nuke
1,226vertigo
1,212dust2
561train
178cbble
41lake
35office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

450Matches
48%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.7ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno9050%1.1417.5
Mirage9049%1.0014.6
Anubis7555%1.1516.2
Ancient6645%1.1518.2
Nuke3839%1.2217.3
Dust23732%0.9113.7
Overpass1878%1.2719.0
Train1242%1.1018.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.7%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
616msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
50.0%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
5.73HE damage / grenade
4.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2901 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5167% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 38 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–20.1922%26 Aug
overpass3–9-0.2017%26 Aug
inferno9–50.0136%26 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0619%25 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1524%25 Aug
inferno7–9-0.1238%20 Aug
inferno9–6-0.1043%20 Aug
inferno9–00.2947%18 Aug
nuke9–40.1422%18 Aug
inferno8–80.0743%18 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0224%14 Aug
inferno9–30.0354%14 Aug
inferno9–20.1617%14 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1318%13 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1433%13 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0523%13 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0453%13 Aug
nuke9–70.0617%13 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0321%13 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1829%12 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0332%12 Aug
inferno8–80.0152%12 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0038%12 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0544%12 Aug
inferno9–60.0826%11 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0347%11 Aug
inferno9–5-0.0638%11 Aug
nuke9–20.2542%11 Aug
inferno8–80.0247%11 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0958%31 Jul
nuke6–90.0721%31 Jul
debris3–9-0.1213%31 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0250%26 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0428%24 Jul
anubis13–80.0125%24 Jul
nuke8–80.1326%24 Jul
debris5–90.0245%24 Jul
eldorado6–90.0322%24 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1825%24 Jul
nuke7–90.0635%24 Jul
mirage13–30.1228%23 Jun
mirage15–150.0237%23 Jun
mirage13–110.0330%22 Jun
overpass9–10.2823%5 Jun
inferno8–80.1024%4 Jun
inferno9–40.1748%3 Jun
ancient13–20.1329%3 Jun
nuke8–8-0.0126%3 Jun
inferno4–90.0353%3 Jun
overpass8–30.0429%3 Jun
inferno9–40.2623%2 Jun
nuke8–80.0126%1 Jun
inferno9–10.2745%1 Jun
nuke9–60.1126%1 Jun
overpass7–9-0.0625%1 Jun
overpass9–30.1623%31 May
inferno5–9-0.0235%31 May
inferno9–60.0841%31 May
mirage13–70.0325%31 May
inferno4–9-0.0648%31 May
nuke9–10.0117%31 May
overpass7–90.0831%29 May
inferno9–20.3637%29 May
inferno8–80.0229%29 May
nuke6–9-0.0330%29 May
cache13–5-0.0227%7 May
overpass8–80.0222%6 May
nuke9–70.1228%6 May
mirage13–70.0847%6 May
anubis6–13-0.0126%27 Apr
dust211–130.0122%14 Apr
dust29–13-0.0123%25 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0923%19 Mar
nuke9–40.1229%19 Mar
ancient8–130.0521%19 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0320%16 Mar
mirage7–130.0225%5 Mar
inferno8–8-0.0628%26 Feb
nuke9–10.2119%26 Feb
inferno9–130.0336%26 Feb
anubis13–50.0831%24 Feb
nuke9–50.1035%23 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0323%19 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0230%17 Feb
mirage14–160.0124%12 Feb
mirage13–50.0833%11 Feb
mirage13–100.1030%11 Feb
nuke9–30.1729%9 Feb
inferno5–9-0.0923%5 Feb
inferno9–50.0418%5 Feb
vertigo5–13-0.0710%4 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0416%4 Feb
anubis13–80.0515%3 Feb
nuke13–5-0.0129%3 Feb
sanctum8–8-0.0115%2 Feb
inferno5–9-0.0715%2 Feb
nuke5–9-0.0320%30 Jan
mirage11–130.0024%29 Jan
nuke2–9-0.1610%22 Jan
inferno8–8-0.0219%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →