Bluntasaurus — CS2 Stats

76561198973480082[U:1:1013214354]

42Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
135Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.2 Learning
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.6%42.5%44.2%5.6% short
Shot accuracy15.7%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.991.040.05 short
Match win rate40.7%44.2%45.3%4.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBluntasaurusFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim24
Positioning37
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY16141Last 3152%Win rateLWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.4
Aggression3.1
Utility3.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.4
Positioning3.7
Utility3.3
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time654ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 31 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 9–7
132Biggest win — ancient
3Longest win streak
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 62% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A138562%-0.05
mirageA85363%-0.04
cache31233%-0.05
ancient32167%-0.01
nuke3030%-0.05
inferno1010%-0.10

Across the last 31 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (62% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,536Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
246Matches
40.7%Match win rate
38.6%Headshot %
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
481MVPs
135Hours (in match)
306Bombs planted
70Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

496inferno
470dust2
101nuke
24train
4vertigo
1ar_monastery
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
45%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
57.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21050%0.6410.3
Mirage367%1.0415.0
Cache250%0.7711.0
Inferno20%0.8222.0
Nuke20%0.529.5
Ancient1100%1.009.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy
28.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.7%Spray accuracy
67.1%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
660msReaction time
19.8%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
3.98HE damage / grenade
5.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5172° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.5558% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4992 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno17–19-0.107%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0314%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0614%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.0919%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0319%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0125%2 Aug
dust216–19-0.0426%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.0714%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.117%2 Aug
dust216–14-0.0614%2 Aug
cache15–19-0.1016%30 Jul
mirage13–9-0.048%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.0411%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.0414%20 Jul
dust213–5-0.117%20 Jul
dust213–8-0.0314%20 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0219%19 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0217%19 Jul
cache5–13-0.049%19 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0513%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0511%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0415%4 Oct
ancient13–2-0.0217%12 Sept
mirage11–4-0.0821%10 Jul
nuke12–12-0.047%7 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0311%17 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0019%16 Jun
dust29–70.1010%30 Dec
dust29–5-0.1215%23 Dec
mirage12–160.0022%21 Mar
cache16–110.0013%11 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →