eye_ball — CS2 Stats

76561198036165653[U:1:75899925]

1,829Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,695Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8274 of 25893 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,030 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,695Peak Premier on CSDB
1,030Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,030
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 21 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,695
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,305 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeye_ballFACEITLevel 5 · 1,030 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,695 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,030csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning54
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateWLWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression7.8
Utility3.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–11
132Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 19ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B47222547%0.00
cacheS1913668%-0.01
mirageC146843%-0.00
nukeC52340%-0.03
infernoA53260%-0.00
ancientD51420%-0.05
anubis42250%-0.00
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

171Matches
52%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
90.5ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26161%1.1218.8
Mirage2846%0.9115.7
Cache2348%0.9215.2
Inferno1354%1.0116.7
Nuke838%0.8815.6
Ancient520%0.6910.8
Anubis540%1.0618.2
Vertigo450%1.0717.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
632msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
5.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–7-0.0525%26 Aug
cache8–130.0034%26 Aug
dust219–17-0.0321%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0417%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0513%16 Aug
dust213–100.0526%12 Aug
dust213–70.0527%7 Aug
dust213–6-0.0232%7 Aug
cache10–13-0.0428%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0720%6 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0425%6 Aug
dust213–80.0123%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0116%6 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0111%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0617%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0017%5 Aug
cache2–13-0.0511%5 Aug
dust213–60.0032%5 Aug
dust213–30.0323%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0324%5 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0015%4 Aug
inferno17–19-0.0422%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0135%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0420%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.0627%4 Aug
dust27–130.0015%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0223%3 Aug
dust213–5-0.0028%3 Aug
dust210–130.0925%3 Aug
dust213–40.1130%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0519%3 Aug
dust212–120.0221%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0328%2 Aug
dust216–14-0.0123%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0138%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0314%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0224%2 Aug
cache11–13-0.0324%2 Aug
dust214–16-0.0123%1 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1137%1 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0820%1 Aug
mirage10–130.0221%1 Aug
dust27–130.0029%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0031%31 Jul
dust216–130.0433%31 Jul
dust23–12-0.0718%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0242%31 Jul
cache13–80.0327%31 Jul
cache13–8-0.0122%31 Jul
cache13–6-0.0236%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0331%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.0123%30 Jul
dust210–130.0225%30 Jul
dust213–100.0329%30 Jul
dust213–110.1428%30 Jul
dust213–5-0.0541%29 Jul
dust29–130.0931%29 Jul
dust213–60.0330%29 Jul
dust23–13-0.0350%29 Jul
anubis13–100.0324%29 Jul
dust213–8-0.0223%29 Jul
mirage16–19-0.0616%29 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0237%28 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0326%28 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0128%28 Jul
ancient13–50.0934%28 Jul
cache13–80.0423%27 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0522%27 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0023%27 Jul
dust213–80.0721%27 Jul
dust28–13-0.0127%26 Jul
anubis13–40.0615%26 Jul
dust225–22-0.0117%24 Jul
dust211–130.0720%23 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0426%23 Jul
dust22–13-0.1225%23 Jul
inferno13–20.0831%23 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0423%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0322%22 Jul
mirage13–60.0121%22 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0116%22 Jul
cache13–20.0318%22 Jul
cache13–11-0.0311%22 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0511%21 Jul
dust213–100.0118%21 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0921%21 Jul
dust27–130.0531%20 Jul
cache16–12-0.0712%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0315%19 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0836%19 Jul
cache13–70.0519%19 Jul
cache13–11-0.0126%17 Jul
cache13–40.0820%17 Jul
mirage14–160.1023%16 Jul
dust24–13-0.0821%16 Jul
dust213–110.0131%16 Jul
cache13–5-0.0615%14 Jul
cache13–100.0019%13 Jul
dust28–130.0126%13 Jul
cache3–13-0.0811%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →