Voltz — CS2 Stats

US76561198972435022[U:1:1012169294]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,509Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,762Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,458Purple band · top ~18.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13411 of 24489 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,125 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

17,458Peak Premier on CSDB

1,125Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,125
Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 76 to go
Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 17,458
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,542 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	63.9%	44.2%	44.9%	above
Shot accuracy	2.5%	11.2%	11.8%	9.4% short
Kill/death ratio	0.93	1.04	1.04	0.11 short
Match win rate	45.1%	45.3%	45.3%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning44

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateWLWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression4.5

Utility5.0

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels0.4

Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning4.4

Utility5.0

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time618ms−4ms

first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms

Headshot accuracy22.3%+3.4%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 20anubisWeakest map · 15% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	22	11–11	50%	0.01
dust2	S	20	14–6	70%	-0.01
inferno	D	15	5–10	33%	-0.02
cache	D	13	4–9	31%	0.00
anubis	D	13	2–11	15%	-0.03
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.01
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,850Lifetime kills

0.93K/D

2,495Matches

45.1%Match win rate

63.9%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players

2.5%Shot accuracy

3,853MVPs

1,378Hours (in match)

2,890Bombs planted

440Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,600

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,564

P2000 / USP-S2,914

Desert Eagle2,278

Glock-181,386

Galil AR1,159

MP91,095

FAMAS760

MAC-10480

AWP259

Lifetime map wins

3,396inferno

3,368dust2

2,037vertigo

1,317nuke

544train

73office

9cbble

5house

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches

53%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

80.4ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win

40%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	5	60%	1.51	21.4
Inferno	4	50%	0.84	10.8
Mirage	4	50%	1.46	20.0
Ancient	2	50%	1.09	18.5
Overpass	1	100%	0.56	10.0
Nuke	1	100%	0.75	15.0
Cache	1	0%	1.07	16.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.58	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy

29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.3%Spray accuracy

80.2%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

616msReaction time

24.2%T opening success

38.8%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

7.0%Flash assists

8.44HE damage / grenade

7.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.2489% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–4	0.06	23%	28 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.08	16%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.00	23%	27 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	31%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	21%	26 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	19%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	29%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	22%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.04	21%	23 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	19%	23 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	25%	20 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.10	14%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	17%	14 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	19%	14 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	29%	13 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.06	24%	13 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.02	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	36%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–3	-0.03	19%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	28%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	26%	10 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.08	9%	9 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	30%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	19%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	40%	5 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	17%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.10	25%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	26%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.02	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	23%	1 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.01	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	28%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	18%	1 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	21%	31 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.00	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	23%	23 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	18%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	25%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.07	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	25%	17 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	15%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	0%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	23%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	14%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	14%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.08	24%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	18%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	13%	15 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.04	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.16	31%	12 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.09	7%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.03	20%	11 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	27%	11 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	18%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.10	35%	11 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	9%	10 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	13%	10 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	20%	10 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	23%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	23%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	10%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	16%	9 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	28%	7 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	16%	7 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	14%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	27%	6 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.08	20%	6 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	29%	4 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	15%	4 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	21%	3 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	11%	3 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	10%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	11%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	25%	2 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.03	17%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	16%	2 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.02	15%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	23%	1 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	15%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	14%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	19%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.02	24%	26 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.00	19%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	23%	26 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	21%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	18%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	8%	25 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	19%	18 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	17%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.03	17%	18 Jun →
inferno	14–16	-0.04	21%	18 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.01	32%	18 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	24%	17 Jun →