juvi — CS2 Stats

76561199025960105[U:1:1065694377]

1,342Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,123Purple band · top ~12% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9828 of 20322 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,123Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,123
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 877 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjuviPREMIER19,123 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning40
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression3.0
Utility5.9
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time565ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–5
133Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2112957%0.01
dust2C145936%0.00
ancientS139469%-0.01
anubisC135838%-0.00
nukeB105550%0.01
infernoC83538%-0.00
cacheC73443%-0.02
vertigoC52340%-0.01
train42250%0.01
office21150%-0.08
fachwerk2020%-0.02
shelter110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
571msReaction time
22.0%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
10.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.99% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0218%27 Aug
dust211–130.0016%27 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0320%27 Aug
cache13–5-0.089%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0115%26 Aug
dust213–50.1123%26 Aug
dust213–100.0019%26 Aug
anubis10–130.0414%26 Aug
nuke13–110.0222%26 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0124%25 Aug
nuke13–30.1010%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0430%25 Aug
cache5–13-0.0123%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0128%25 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0313%25 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0512%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0328%25 Aug
dust27–130.0423%24 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0314%24 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0128%24 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0017%24 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0223%24 Aug
dust28–130.0631%24 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0115%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0415%23 Aug
cache5–130.0023%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0425%19 Aug
office7–13-0.0733%19 Aug
dust28–130.0627%19 Aug
dust213–9-0.0634%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0319%18 Aug
vertigo10–40.0218%18 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0419%18 Aug
dust29–130.0323%18 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0316%18 Aug
anubis13–80.0321%17 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0211%17 Aug
mirage3–13-0.078%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0221%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0215%17 Aug
ancient4–130.0014%17 Aug
nuke10–130.0113%17 Aug
inferno7–130.0221%17 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0613%17 Aug
train13–80.0121%17 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0222%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0419%14 Aug
shelter13–60.0532%12 Aug
office13–9-0.0821%12 Aug
train11–13-0.0022%12 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0130%12 Aug
dust212–12-0.0328%6 Aug
dust212–16-0.0917%5 Aug
mirage13–40.1020%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0721%4 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0313%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.0217%3 Aug
ancient13–60.0421%3 Aug
inferno16–120.0418%3 Aug
mirage13–50.1420%3 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0024%3 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0215%3 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0031%3 Aug
fachwerk9–13-0.0418%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0417%3 Aug
inferno13–90.0420%30 Jul
mirage13–60.0326%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0227%29 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0516%29 Jul
mirage7–130.0623%29 Jul
anubis13–40.0228%29 Jul
mirage13–100.0323%29 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0218%29 Jul
nuke16–120.0122%29 Jul
mirage12–120.1024%29 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.086%29 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0218%29 Jul
mirage6–20.0120%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0419%29 Jul
anubis12–120.0115%28 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0013%28 Jul
vertigo13–40.0120%28 Jul
cache13–6-0.0411%28 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0118%28 Jul
train13–50.0220%28 Jul
dust213–10-0.0329%28 Jul
dust26–130.0318%28 Jul
train8–130.0142%28 Jul
fachwerk8–13-0.0035%28 Jul
cache10–130.0130%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0115%27 Jul
dust213–9-0.0220%27 Jul
cache13–30.0130%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0222%23 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0233%23 Jul
anubis13–80.0632%23 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0510%23 Jul
anubis11–130.0112%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.1043%22 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0323%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →