Pars — CS2 Stats

76561198334777184[U:1:374511456]

1,784Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,553Blue band · top ~30.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13992 of 21396 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,124 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,124Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,124
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 77 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,553
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 447 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGParsFACEITLevel 5 · 1,124 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,553 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,124csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45514Last 10045%Win rateWWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression7.1
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time591ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 10.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–5
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%0.01
dust2D1651131%0.01
cacheC145936%0.01
infernoD1331023%-0.01
ancientS108280%0.02
anubisD72529%0.01
overpassA74357%0.02
nukeS64267%-0.02
office220100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches
51%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
69.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2864%1.0913.6
Inferno1650%0.9113.5
Vertigo1553%1.2814.5
Ancient1182%1.1216.6
Overpass1050%1.4414.4
Nuke729%0.8813.6
Dust2650%0.8011.7
Anubis580%0.8514.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy
43.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
585msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.09HE damage / grenade
6.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.5655% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7604% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0121%29 Aug
mirage13–20.0543%28 Aug
mirage16–120.0313%28 Aug
cache13–60.0914%28 Aug
nuke8–130.0111%28 Aug
dust25–130.1019%27 Aug
dust211–130.0215%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0212%27 Aug
cache13–50.076%27 Aug
mirage13–80.039%26 Aug
anubis10–130.0610%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.007%26 Aug
mirage9–130.049%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.093%24 Aug
anubis13–8-0.049%24 Aug
mirage16–120.0218%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0211%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.037%23 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0117%22 Aug
mirage10–130.0216%9 Jun
mirage13–50.119%9 Jun
dust27–130.0927%9 Jun
overpass13–16-0.038%28 May
dust213–3-0.0116%28 May
overpass7–130.0820%18 May
inferno14–16-0.0815%17 May
dust213–4-0.0717%17 May
dust213–100.0415%17 May
mirage13–11-0.0015%15 May
mirage13–110.0611%14 May
mirage2–13-0.0520%14 May
mirage13–70.0418%14 May
mirage9–130.018%13 May
office13–70.055%13 May
office13–20.0815%13 May
inferno8–130.069%13 May
mirage11–13-0.028%11 May
dust27–130.0316%10 May
nuke13–8-0.0614%10 May
cache13–7-0.0215%9 May
cache9–130.0314%9 May
cache12–12-0.0313%9 May
overpass13–11-0.0412%7 May
ancient13–60.0215%7 May
cache9–13-0.034%6 May
mirage13–11-0.0513%6 May
cache6–130.016%6 May
mirage5–13-0.0336%4 May
mirage6–13-0.0313%4 May
cache10–130.067%3 May
cache8–130.0316%3 May
inferno6–13-0.0213%3 May
mirage15–15-0.006%3 May
overpass13–60.0811%3 May
cache2–13-0.0010%3 May
dust29–13-0.0112%3 May
mirage10–130.0015%2 May
cache13–8-0.047%2 May
cache9–13-0.0116%2 May
mirage13–80.0311%2 May
cache12–120.018%1 May
cache10–50.046%30 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0014%28 Apr
overpass13–90.0021%28 Apr
dust214–16-0.0113%27 Apr
overpass7–130.047%27 Apr
inferno14–160.008%20 Apr
mirage9–130.017%18 Apr
ancient2–13-0.038%16 Apr
inferno10–13-0.055%15 Apr
dust210–130.097%15 Apr
anubis13–90.0012%15 Apr
inferno13–8-0.015%15 Apr
mirage11–130.0211%14 Apr
nuke4–130.0213%14 Apr
ancient13–50.0313%14 Apr
dust213–8-0.016%14 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0211%14 Apr
mirage13–60.0216%14 Apr
dust29–13-0.0113%14 Apr
anubis10–130.0413%13 Apr
ancient13–50.125%13 Apr
ancient13–8-0.016%13 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0414%13 Apr
dust213–70.0120%13 Apr
inferno16–130.0510%13 Apr
dust25–13-0.0113%13 Apr
ancient13–70.0313%13 Apr
inferno8–130.048%13 Apr
inferno10–130.027%12 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0512%12 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0211%12 Apr
ancient10–130.0510%8 Apr
anubis10–130.0311%8 Apr
dust211–13-0.047%7 Apr
nuke13–8-0.069%7 Apr
anubis15–15-0.038%7 Apr
inferno16–140.014%6 Apr
overpass13–110.0011%6 Apr
inferno3–9-0.0711%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →