N0ted.-

N0ted.- — CS2 Stats

AT76561198971475721[U:1:1011209993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

262Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
460Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate50.1%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy17.6%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.000.99above
Match win rate44.1%42.9%43.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 3 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGN0ted.-FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning54
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52426Last 10052%Win rateTWWLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression5.9
Utility2.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.4
Utility2.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time580ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.34Best rating — vertigo 9–0
133Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA23131057%-0.02
mirageC167944%0.03
vertigoA159660%0.09
dust2C94544%-0.00
nukeC83538%-0.02
overpassS86275%0.04
cbbleS64267%-0.04
cache32167%-0.04
anubis3030%-0.02
ancient32167%-0.04
boulder2020%0.00
fachwerk110100%0.01
brewery1010%-0.13
assembly110100%0.10
shortnuke1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,770Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
946Matches
44.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
50.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 2 players
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players
2,349MVPs
227Hours (in match)
474Bombs planted
116Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,175inferno
992vertigo
776dust2
528nuke
153train
125cbble
7militia
4assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
48%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
93.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.4%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
610msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
47.6%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
6.61HE damage / grenade
3.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3165 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7588% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–12-0.0217%29 Aug
cache13–60.0229%23 Aug
nuke11–30.0514%23 Aug
inferno1–13-0.120%23 Aug
dust213–60.0830%22 Aug
inferno13–70.0724%21 Aug
inferno5–9-0.116%13 Aug
boulder11–130.0219%12 Aug
fachwerk13–100.0120%12 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0718%12 Aug
cache5–13-0.0535%12 Aug
cache13–11-0.0829%11 Aug
boulder9–13-0.0120%10 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0719%10 Aug
nuke13–40.0312%9 Aug
dust28–130.0340%8 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0824%30 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0615%20 May
inferno9–70.1315%20 May
dust25–130.0738%17 May
mirage13–100.0930%17 May
mirage13–90.0420%15 May
mirage13–160.0025%15 May
overpass13–110.0215%15 May
inferno9–6-0.0744%15 May
inferno9–60.0925%15 May
ancient10–13-0.070%14 May
ancient13–3-0.0524%14 May
inferno13–100.0125%14 May
inferno5–9-0.1850%14 May
vertigo9–60.0223%14 May
dust211–13-0.0030%14 May
nuke11–6-0.0917%10 May
nuke8–13-0.0421%10 May
vertigo8–80.0516%6 May
mirage15–150.0041%29 Apr
inferno8–8-0.1615%29 Apr
inferno9–40.1133%29 Apr
mirage13–100.0219%21 Apr
anubis11–130.0118%19 Apr
vertigo6–9-0.0033%19 Apr
vertigo9–00.1446%19 Apr
dust213–9-0.0114%17 Apr
dust213–110.0029%17 Apr
dust211–13-0.0318%17 Apr
mirage7–120.0113%13 Apr
nuke13–160.0018%10 Apr
mirage13–90.0218%1 Apr
dust213–90.0010%1 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0119%31 Mar
mirage11–130.0912%31 Mar
overpass6–130.0218%30 Mar
inferno9–7-0.0240%25 Mar
inferno5–90.0231%23 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0122%29 Jun
brewery5–9-0.1324%1 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0835%31 May
inferno9–60.0337%9 Apr
inferno13–110.0721%4 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1322%28 Sept
mirage13–60.1128%22 Sept
mirage2–130.0221%20 Sept
mirage13–50.1420%16 Sept
inferno6–9-0.1635%31 Aug
nuke6–9-0.0333%31 Aug
overpass3–13-0.0515%30 Aug
dust20–13-0.1533%30 Aug
vertigo0–9-0.1533%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0524%26 Aug
assembly9–20.1031%14 Aug
overpass9–7-0.0214%14 Aug
vertigo0–20.000%26 Jul
overpass13–90.0028%11 Jul
shortnuke2–9-0.0914%18 Sept
cbble3–9-0.2019%15 Sept
vertigo9–30.1912%7 Sept
vertigo4–90.1757%7 Sept
overpass9–70.1316%6 Sept
vertigo9–10.3121%3 Sept
vertigo9–40.2621%30 Jul
inferno9–6-0.1814%19 Jul
cbble12–90.0313%19 Jul
ancient16–140.0017%18 Jul
cbble9–7-0.0523%16 Jul
overpass15–110.0532%16 Jul
cbble3–9-0.170%16 Jul
overpass9–10.207%16 Jul
vertigo9–00.3460%16 Jul
inferno3–90.1133%16 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0516%14 Jul
inferno7–9-0.108%9 Jul
vertigo9–60.1410%2 Jul
anubis11–16-0.028%25 Jun
mirage16–60.1129%25 Jun
cbble9–10.1115%25 Jun
inferno9–40.1063%25 Jun
vertigo9–4-0.0721%25 Jun
cbble9–30.0114%25 Jun
mirage9–16-0.0815%24 Jun
vertigo5–00.0040%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →