Tingus Pingus

Tingus Pingus — CS2 Stats

76561198962812708[U:1:1002546980]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

625Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
325Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,999Blue band · top ~39% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19453 of 28605 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,240), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate45.2%41.7%44.1%above
Shot accuracy9.2%8.8%11.4%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.020.971.03meets
Match win rate39.6%43.8%45.2%5.6% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTingus PingusPREMIER12,999 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning41
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53416Last 10053%Win rateLTTLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression2.6
Utility3.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.1
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time651ms+47ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — boulder 10–2
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB21111052%-0.00
cacheA2012860%0.00
anubisA1710759%-0.02
nukeS118373%0.01
infernoA95456%-0.02
mirageB63350%-0.01
dust2B63350%0.02
office3030%-0.06
train2020%-0.07
vertigo2020%0.01
boulder110100%0.17
fachwerk1010%0.07
shelter1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,048Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Blue band
1,070Matches
39.6%Match win rate
45.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
9.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
1,408MVPs
325Hours (in match)
899Bombs planted
240Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

961nuke
809vertigo
489dust2
411inferno
87train
43lake
41safehouse
30office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
648msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
29.5%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.65HE damage / grenade
4.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3879 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.4838% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train8–13-0.0819%8 Aug
vertigo12–120.0118%8 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0416%8 Aug
cache7–130.0320%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0235%8 Aug
vertigo8–130.0216%6 Aug
train11–13-0.067%6 Aug
nuke13–60.0933%6 Aug
cache13–80.0620%6 Aug
ancient11–13-0.049%4 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0119%4 Aug
anubis13–2-0.0419%4 Aug
ancient11–130.0119%4 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0023%3 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0626%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0523%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0431%3 Aug
anubis13–50.0328%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0518%30 Jul
ancient13–90.0511%30 Jul
inferno13–50.038%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0814%30 Jul
cache13–50.1418%29 Jul
nuke8–13-0.067%28 Jul
cache11–13-0.0212%28 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0423%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0111%24 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0312%24 Jul
cache13–10.0610%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0319%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0116%23 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0020%23 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0115%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0925%23 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0023%23 Jul
nuke13–60.0222%23 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0425%22 Jul
nuke13–70.0733%21 Jul
nuke13–8-0.049%21 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0514%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0911%21 Jul
anubis15–15-0.037%19 Jul
ancient13–40.0114%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.046%19 Jul
cache16–130.0220%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0610%18 Jul
cache8–13-0.0512%18 Jul
anubis13–5-0.068%18 Jul
dust210–130.0312%18 Jul
anubis16–120.0415%16 Jul
nuke12–160.0110%16 Jul
mirage13–2-0.007%16 Jul
cache7–13-0.0219%16 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0311%15 Jul
cache13–10-0.0316%15 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0110%15 Jul
dust27–20.058%15 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0214%14 Jul
anubis13–110.018%14 Jul
inferno13–100.038%14 Jul
cache3–130.0115%14 Jul
ancient13–110.0111%14 Jul
dust215–15-0.0114%14 Jul
anubis13–100.0610%14 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0718%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0313%11 Jul
mirage16–140.039%11 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0119%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.079%11 Jul
boulder10–20.1716%9 Jul
fachwerk12–120.0714%9 Jul
shelter12–120.0213%9 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0517%9 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0312%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0418%9 Jul
cache4–13-0.0117%9 Jul
dust213–50.0515%9 Jul
office8–13-0.0721%9 Jul
office9–13-0.0113%9 Jul
office3–13-0.0923%9 Jul
ancient13–60.0418%7 Jul
cache13–6-0.0525%7 Jul
nuke13–80.0710%4 Jul
ancient13–110.0416%4 Jul
ancient4–13-0.025%4 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0010%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.017%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0115%4 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0516%4 Jul
cache13–90.0511%4 Jul
cache9–130.0616%3 Jul
anubis6–130.017%3 Jul
ancient13–100.0610%3 Jul
dust213–100.0012%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0521%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0510%2 Jul
cache13–50.0216%2 Jul
cache13–8-0.056%2 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0412%1 Jul
ancient6–13-0.055%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →