lexus enjoyer

lexus enjoyer — CS2 Stats

76561198851936290[U:1:891670562]Steam profile ↗

972Tracked matches55%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,117Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,749Purple band · top ~17.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20026 of 39419 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,025 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,137Peak Premier on CSDB
1,025Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,025
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 26 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 388 below peak (18,137)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,251 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.1%42.7%44.0%1.9% short
Shot accuracy0.7%10.8%11.6%10.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.001.030.18 short
Match win rate38.7%44.1%45.1%6.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlexus enjoyerFACEITLevel 4 · 1,025 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,749 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,025csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression8.8
Utility5.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time613ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–0
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 6nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB189950%-0.01
cacheB189950%0.00
dust2S129375%0.01
nukeD124833%0.01
infernoS64267%0.01
anubisB63350%0.00
trainD62433%0.04
vertigoS660100%0.08
ancientC52340%0.01
office42250%0.07
debris21150%0.03
fachwerk21150%0.07
poseidon1010%-0.02
shelter110100%0.10
boulder110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,275Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
1,696Matches
38.7%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
0.7%Shot accuracy
3,369MVPs
532Hours (in match)
1,440Bombs planted
391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,030dust2
1,752nuke
1,350inferno
652train
414vertigo
183office
29cbble
15assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
46%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
80.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%0.9315.0
Nuke560%0.8615.6
Dust2425%0.7012.8
Ancient450%1.0717.0
Overpass333%1.1316.0
Inferno250%1.2317.5
Anubis1100%1.2222.0
Cache1100%2.5020.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
91.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
608msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
8.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.466 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5691% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.087%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0211%27 Aug
cache13–30.0829%27 Aug
cache13–6-0.0021%26 Aug
dust28–130.0121%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0440%25 Aug
dust213–10-0.0110%24 Aug
mirage13–20.0824%24 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0012%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0118%23 Aug
office13–70.0521%22 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0318%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0111%19 Aug
anubis8–13-0.018%19 Aug
office7–130.0537%15 Aug
train13–70.0428%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0219%12 Aug
train5–13-0.0018%12 Aug
train11–130.0215%12 Aug
vertigo13–70.0620%10 Aug
cache5–13-0.027%10 Aug
cache13–30.0220%9 Aug
cache13–00.1920%8 Aug
office13–80.0915%6 Aug
nuke13–160.0311%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0711%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0714%4 Aug
mirage11–130.0818%3 Aug
vertigo13–70.019%3 Aug
dust213–100.0521%2 Aug
inferno13–90.0220%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0315%29 Jul
cache15–15-0.0616%29 Jul
vertigo13–60.1022%29 Jul
anubis13–60.0323%29 Jul
vertigo13–70.1120%29 Jul
debris9–50.0620%29 Jul
ancient8–130.0314%28 Jul
cache13–80.0019%28 Jul
dust213–7-0.0429%28 Jul
mirage13–10.0226%28 Jul
cache13–110.0513%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0510%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0313%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.089%27 Jul
train10–130.0328%27 Jul
dust213–110.0323%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0123%26 Jul
inferno13–40.0327%26 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0511%25 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0127%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0625%25 Jul
cache15–150.0119%25 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0313%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0218%24 Jul
train9–130.0635%23 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0411%23 Jul
cache13–110.0415%22 Jul
anubis13–30.0122%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0017%22 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0212%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0313%21 Jul
cache10–13-0.0021%21 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0633%21 Jul
poseidon6–9-0.0213%21 Jul
office6–130.0715%20 Jul
inferno13–8-0.029%20 Jul
fachwerk11–130.0510%20 Jul
vertigo5–00.0729%20 Jul
anubis16–140.0512%20 Jul
dust213–80.0716%19 Jul
dust213–90.0327%18 Jul
dust213–30.0117%18 Jul
train13–30.1022%18 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0216%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0121%18 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0420%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.067%17 Jul
mirage16–13-0.026%16 Jul
nuke11–130.058%16 Jul
shelter13–30.1010%15 Jul
cache13–16-0.0712%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0120%14 Jul
cache13–80.0119%14 Jul
nuke4–9-0.0812%14 Jul
fachwerk13–80.1015%14 Jul
vertigo13–110.1214%14 Jul
nuke13–160.0322%14 Jul
boulder13–90.0213%14 Jul
debris4–9-0.0119%13 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0715%13 Jul
dust213–40.017%13 Jul
dust213–100.0015%13 Jul
cache10–130.0119%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0120%13 Jul
dust215–15-0.0319%13 Jul
nuke13–50.1018%12 Jul
ancient6–130.1021%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.047%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0517%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →