Nameless

Nameless — CS2 Stats

76561198840406910[U:1:880141182]Steam profile ↗

131Tracked matches44%Win rate2023Tracked since
116Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating7,348Light Blue band · top ~67.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18837 of 24923 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate41.9%40.1%41.7%meets
Shot accuracy3.8%7.6%8.8%5.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.920.920.970.05 short
Match win rate42.9%42.2%43.8%meets

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNamelessPREMIER7,348 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning43
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51427Last 10051%Win rateLLLWLTLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression5.7
Utility3.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.3
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time635ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 85% over 13mirageWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2291341%0.01
mirageC2281436%0.02
nukeA1710759%0.03
infernoS1311285%0.01
trainA95456%0.01
overpassA74357%-0.01
ancientA53260%-0.01
vertigo31233%0.03
boulder1010%0.02
anubis1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

2,235Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
163Matches
42.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Light Blue band
41.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band
3.8%Shot accuracy
237MVPs
56Hours (in match)
152Bombs planted
31Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

357dust2
222nuke
209inferno
154train
61vertigo
4cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
637msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
5.10HE damage / grenade
3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3937 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2649% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust20–130.0210%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.076%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0618%9 Aug
ancient13–90.017%9 Aug
nuke11–130.0628%8 Aug
boulder12–120.0218%8 Aug
nuke8–130.0628%8 Aug
vertigo8–130.0118%8 Aug
vertigo7–13-0.0010%7 Aug
dust213–3-0.0118%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0217%7 Aug
vertigo13–20.0813%6 Aug
dust211–13-0.0114%6 Aug
train13–90.0621%5 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0014%1 Aug
mirage11–130.039%1 Aug
mirage13–50.0717%30 Jul
mirage12–120.0424%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0310%27 Jul
mirage1–7-0.057%27 Jul
dust212–12-0.0423%21 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0515%5 Sept
inferno9–10.133%5 Sept
overpass4–13-0.1018%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.007%1 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0015%1 Aug
nuke13–70.0117%1 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0117%1 Aug
mirage2–130.038%1 Aug
nuke6–130.016%1 Aug
mirage13–60.0616%1 Aug
inferno13–90.0922%1 Aug
mirage14–160.1223%31 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0211%31 Jul
dust29–130.0412%31 Jul
overpass13–5-0.0216%31 Jul
mirage6–130.0515%31 Jul
overpass13–40.1317%31 Jul
dust24–130.0233%31 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0113%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0013%30 Jul
ancient13–90.0213%30 Jul
dust213–40.1318%30 Jul
overpass15–15-0.0614%30 Jul
nuke13–00.0321%29 Jul
train7–13-0.0116%29 Jul
train7–13-0.063%29 Jul
dust24–130.0020%29 Jul
dust24–120.0315%27 Jul
dust24–13-0.0315%27 Jul
overpass13–30.0010%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0816%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0113%26 Jul
ancient6–13-0.079%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0717%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0416%26 Jul
nuke13–50.049%26 Jul
inferno9–13-0.009%26 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0210%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.067%25 Jul
nuke13–90.1320%24 Jul
nuke13–50.0921%24 Jul
dust213–90.0614%24 Jul
mirage1–7-0.0713%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.0211%23 Jul
dust213–20.0925%23 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0221%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0413%22 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0015%22 Jul
train13–90.0612%21 Jul
mirage7–130.0428%21 Jul
inferno13–50.049%21 Jul
nuke12–12-0.054%20 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0020%20 Jul
mirage13–10.0418%20 Jul
nuke13–40.0915%20 Jul
nuke13–30.0143%20 Jul
inferno13–40.0014%20 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0212%20 Jul
dust22–00.000%20 Jul
dust213–6-0.0122%20 Jul
dust213–8-0.0211%20 Jul
dust26–130.0611%20 Jul
train13–80.0817%20 Jul
dust212–120.0012%19 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0723%19 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0210%19 Jul
train11–13-0.0611%19 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0222%18 Jul
nuke9–40.078%16 Jul
mirage4–130.0515%16 Jul
dust213–110.0517%15 Jul
train13–60.0511%15 Jul
nuke11–130.0514%15 Jul
train6–13-0.0216%15 Jul
nuke1–13-0.1112%15 Jul
train13–2-0.018%14 Jul
anubis12–120.035%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.048%13 Jul
inferno6–2-0.0115%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →