Marii

Marii — CS2 Stats

FJ76561198822051774[U:1:861786046]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,167Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,008Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,960Purple band · top ~12.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24214 of 55171 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate37.1%44.0%44.7%7.7% short
Shot accuracy17.2%11.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.041.031.04meets
Match win rate44.9%45.1%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMariiFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,960 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning49
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression5.7
Utility4.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch7.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.9
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time571ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–6
130Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32161650%0.02
anubisB189950%0.00
dust2A1710759%0.02
cacheA159660%0.01
infernoD102820%-0.00
nuke42250%-0.02
ancient31233%-0.02
overpass110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

185,409Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,577Matches
44.9%Match win rate
37.1%Headshot %
17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
27,442MVPs
3,752Hours (in match)
5,057Bombs planted
2,387Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,584
AWP41,006
FAMAS4,564
MAC-104,351
MP93,865

Lifetime map wins

12,055dust2
9,497inferno
4,168nuke
3,262train
1,123cbble
1,091office
1,002vertigo
32aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

774Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
80.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

55%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage771%1.1618.9
Anubis560%1.0416.8
Dust2450%1.2421.0
Cache475%1.2016.3
Ancient4100%0.8216.0
Inferno333%0.8515.3
Nuke333%0.7411.0
Vertigo10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.2%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
567msReaction time
26.9%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
2.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.5887 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8705% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.0412%29 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0624%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0720%28 Aug
cache13–70.0219%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0418%28 Aug
nuke4–13-0.087%26 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0116%25 Aug
mirage13–110.0221%25 Aug
cache13–16-0.0419%18 Aug
mirage16–120.0218%18 Aug
mirage13–40.0116%18 Aug
anubis13–80.0514%16 Aug
mirage3–10-0.019%4 Aug
mirage7–130.0519%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0321%30 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0311%27 Jul
cache8–130.0518%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0519%27 Jul
dust213–60.1020%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0714%27 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0217%24 Jul
mirage13–40.0111%24 Jul
cache13–30.0619%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0018%24 Jul
dust28–130.059%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0413%24 Jul
cache13–6-0.0522%23 Jul
cache13–7-0.0318%23 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0619%23 Jul
dust213–60.1413%21 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0421%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.017%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0313%19 Jul
cache13–6-0.0117%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0124%18 Jul
mirage13–160.0815%16 Jul
mirage14–16-0.028%16 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0122%16 Jul
cache13–60.1920%16 Jul
cache15–15-0.0416%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0625%15 Jul
cache13–110.0919%14 Jul
dust213–50.039%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.012%14 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0216%14 Jul
dust24–13-0.0414%14 Jul
mirage12–160.016%13 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0215%13 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0338%12 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0318%11 Jul
cache13–5-0.0211%10 Jul
nuke13–80.0314%10 Jul
dust216–140.0115%10 Jul
dust211–13-0.0414%10 Jul
cache4–13-0.0411%10 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0314%10 Jul
inferno7–130.0414%9 Jul
mirage13–90.0425%9 Jul
cache8–130.0125%9 Jul
cache13–110.0010%9 Jul
anubis16–140.0314%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0919%4 Jul
dust25–130.0112%4 Jul
dust216–12-0.046%3 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0121%3 Jul
inferno13–70.073%3 Jul
anubis5–130.0110%3 Jul
dust213–9-0.0313%3 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0314%2 Jul
inferno13–10.0128%2 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0016%2 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0427%2 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0619%2 Jul
dust29–130.0224%2 Jul
dust213–9-0.0014%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0327%1 Jul
cache9–13-0.0221%30 Jun
dust213–40.0319%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0333%29 Jun
anubis14–160.0624%29 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0410%25 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0215%25 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0214%25 Jun
mirage13–0-0.0013%25 Jun
mirage13–50.1127%24 Jun
inferno7–130.0215%24 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0113%24 Jun
mirage10–130.024%24 Jun
mirage13–70.0611%24 Jun
dust213–110.0614%24 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0424%23 Jun
anubis13–110.0315%23 Jun
mirage13–110.1317%23 Jun
anubis13–70.058%23 Jun
dust29–13-0.0418%22 Jun
dust213–90.0525%22 Jun
inferno4–130.0322%22 Jun
anubis9–130.0319%22 Jun
overpass13–80.0530%19 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0220%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →