tung tung tung sahitler — CS2 Stats

76561198820724367[U:1:860458639]✓ No bans

161Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
112Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate60.3%44.7%46.1%above
Shot accuracy10.0%11.9%12.6%2.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.381.041.05above
Match win rate59.6%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtung tung tung sahitlerFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52435Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression9.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels5.9

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time588ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy31.3%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 31.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — nuke 9–2
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 43% over 35
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C35152043%0.04
mirageB32161650%0.03
nukeS1813572%0.09
anubis440100%0.01
overpass32167%0.03
ancient2020%-0.01
inferno21150%0.13
cache1010%0.03
stronghold1010%0.13
office1010%0.06
vertigo110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

6,538Lifetime kills
1.38K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
277Matches
59.6%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 6 players
60.3%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 6 players
10.0%Shot accuracy
1,065MVPs
112Hours (in match)
265Bombs planted
61Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

748dust2
537nuke
222inferno
28office
28vertigo
16cbble
16train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.8%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
598msReaction time
43.7%T opening success
63.5%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
11.65HE damage / grenade
7.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4924 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 35 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache1–30.03100%27 Jul
nuke13–60.0527%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0923%9 Jun
dust29–13-0.0231%1 Jun
dust213–110.0728%26 Apr
dust210–130.0730%26 Apr
dust26–130.0622%23 Apr
mirage15–150.0420%22 Apr
dust25–130.0737%20 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0524%20 Apr
dust22–13-0.0923%20 Apr
dust213–90.0327%17 Apr
dust216–14-0.0128%17 Apr
mirage4–130.0355%15 Apr
anubis13–50.0132%15 Apr
nuke13–90.0433%14 Apr
dust213–90.0636%14 Apr
nuke13–70.0830%1 Apr
dust213–90.1133%26 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0227%26 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0427%25 Mar
nuke5–00.1043%25 Mar
mirage13–80.0527%23 Mar
mirage6–130.0019%22 Mar
nuke15–150.0126%21 Mar
anubis13–80.0224%21 Mar
anubis13–110.0129%20 Mar
mirage9–130.0131%16 Mar
mirage13–80.0022%12 Mar
dust29–130.0226%10 Mar
dust22–60.0240%8 Mar
dust29–130.0639%5 Mar
nuke13–10.1817%5 Mar
nuke11–130.0535%5 Mar
mirage10–130.0330%5 Mar
dust213–80.0739%4 Mar
nuke13–110.0734%4 Mar
dust213–50.1234%4 Mar
dust28–130.1031%2 Mar
dust29–130.0117%1 Mar
mirage13–90.0522%27 Feb
mirage13–10.0613%27 Feb
dust22–60.1020%26 Feb
dust213–160.0630%26 Feb
mirage13–80.0826%25 Feb
nuke11–130.0719%18 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0016%18 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0850%8 Feb
dust24–13-0.0515%8 Feb
dust25–13-0.0233%8 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0118%8 Feb
mirage6–130.0327%8 Feb
mirage13–70.0618%2 Feb
mirage13–30.0330%2 Feb
dust213–60.0530%2 Feb
nuke13–40.1229%2 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0835%1 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0820%1 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0340%1 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0128%1 Feb
dust213–10-0.0222%1 Feb
mirage13–20.0933%25 Jan
mirage13–60.0222%25 Jan
mirage13–10.1713%25 Jan
dust216–14-0.0133%22 Jan
stronghold12–120.1342%21 Jan
office12–120.0634%20 Jan
dust213–10.1349%20 Jan
overpass9–30.1727%20 Jan
vertigo9–40.0971%20 Jan
nuke9–00.2112%20 Jan
inferno9–70.2132%20 Jan
nuke9–20.3029%20 Jan
mirage13–90.0225%16 Jan
ancient13–160.0632%15 Jan
nuke13–50.0242%15 Jan
dust211–130.0329%15 Jan
mirage15–150.0327%14 Jan
dust211–130.0320%14 Jan
dust213–11-0.0233%14 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0126%14 Jan
dust29–13-0.0130%13 Jan
nuke13–20.1618%13 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0113%11 Jan
dust213–70.0430%11 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0423%11 Jan
mirage13–90.0123%11 Jan
mirage9–130.0617%11 Jan
nuke13–50.1131%11 Jan
dust213–60.0717%11 Jan
inferno11–130.0531%11 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0122%11 Jan
dust29–13-0.0028%10 Jan
mirage10–130.0819%10 Jan
dust216–140.0621%10 Jan
mirage13–110.1123%10 Jan
dust214–160.0430%9 Jan
nuke10–130.0321%9 Jan
mirage13–50.1021%9 Jan
dust214–160.0833%9 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →