THChip — CS2 Stats

76561198724811472[U:1:764545744]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

180Tracked matches73%Win rate2026Tracked since

309Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating5,119Light Blue band · top ~78.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#44082 of 57652 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,554), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Light Blue band median	Blue band median	vs Blue band
Headshot rate	41.5%	39.9%	41.5%	meets
Shot accuracy	0.0%	6.3%	9.1%	9.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.42	0.91	0.98	above
Match win rate	51.1%	42.1%	43.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning50

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression5.0

Utility3.5

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning5.0

Utility3.5

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time596ms−58ms

first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–7

13–1Biggest win — cache

14Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	30	17–13	57%	0.03
dust2	A	24	14–10	58%	0.02
cache	B	20	9–11	45%	0.02
anubis	D	9	2–7	22%	0.03
nuke	S	9	7–2	78%	0.04
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

8,057Lifetime kills

1.42K/D · Top 5% of Light Blue band

458Matches

51.1%Match win rate · Top 5% of Light Blue band

41.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Light Blue band

0.0%Shot accuracy

1,231MVPs

167Hours (in match)

699Bombs planted

189Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-471,915

M4A4 / M4A1-S1,793

AWP744

Galil AR622

P2000 / USP-S424

Glock-18420

MP7360

Desert Eagle352

SG 553158

Tec-9143

Lifetime map wins

1,161dust2

210nuke

112office

94inferno

67vertigo

44train

3italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy

33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.3%Spray accuracy

76.1%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

597msReaction time

29.7%T opening success

40.2%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

10.10HE damage / grenade

1.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9956% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.487 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.7076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–8	0.08	22%	31 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.01	15%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	23%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.11	14%	31 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	8%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	11%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	10%	30 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	24%	30 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	21%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	18%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	13%	30 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	21%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	13%	29 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	18%	28 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	9%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.11	20%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	13%	28 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.10	11%	27 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.06	10%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	13%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.06	11%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	15%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	11%	25 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	4%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.14	10%	24 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	17%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	9%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	11%	23 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.09	8%	23 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	3%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	4%	23 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.08	16%	21 Aug →
anubis	2–13	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.01	9%	21 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.07	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	6%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.04	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	11%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	8%	18 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	4%	18 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	2%	17 Aug →
cache	1–6	-0.10	0%	17 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.06	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.07	9%	17 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	4%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	8%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	7%	16 Aug →
office	8–13	0.02	9%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	1–9	-0.04	0%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	13%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.07	17%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.07	5%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.09	11%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.08	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	7%	12 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.07	8%	11 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	25%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.05	26%	11 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	16%	10 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.05	12%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	8%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.10	22%	9 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	6%	9 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.00	22%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	5%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	11%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.14	12%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.07	40%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	13%	8 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.07	21%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.13	6%	6 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.02	12%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.18	12%	4 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.07	13%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	15%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.14	26%	3 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	9%	3 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	5%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.06	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	19%	1 Aug →
office	13–6	0.15	14%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.13	7%	1 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	11%	1 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.07	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	13%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.10	15%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	22%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	8%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	13%	26 Jul →