Mikael — CS2 Stats

76561198400349278[U:1:440083550]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

165Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 Developing

Premier CS Rating10,796Blue band · top ~50.7% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning62

Utility16

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateLWWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression9.9

Utility1.6

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning6.2

Utility1.6

Mechanics5.5

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.04

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time574ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms

Headshot accuracy13.8%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 26infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	36	16–20	44%	0.00
dust2	B	26	13–13	50%	-0.03
cache	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.01
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.03
overpass	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.08
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.1%Spray accuracy

74.9%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

571msReaction time

39.0%T opening success

57.6%CT opening success

0.21Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

10.57HE damage / grenade

0.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.592% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2059 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.014% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	9–13	-0.08	6%	31 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	13%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.04	14%	31 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	16%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	13%	30 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	15%	28 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.09	9%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	8%	27 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.03	17%	27 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	0.05	7%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	20%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	11%	26 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.01	22%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	10%	25 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	12%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	12%	25 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	11%	24 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	16%	23 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.08	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	6%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	14%	22 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.07	12%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	20%	21 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.10	7%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	18%	20 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.03	33%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	11%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	10%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.11	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.10	23%	19 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	8%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.08	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	19%	18 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	20%	18 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	14%	18 Aug →
cache	1–6	-0.04	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	11%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.03	18%	17 Aug →
inferno	10–4	-0.08	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.09	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	10%	16 Aug →
office	8–13	-0.01	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	1–9	0.04	38%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.00	4%	15 Aug →
nuke	11–4	0.01	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	14%	15 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.10	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	15%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	29%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.04	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	17%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	2%	11 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.08	6%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.14	12%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	10%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	19%	9 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.00	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	24%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	15%	9 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.01	20%	4 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.05	19%	4 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.05	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.05	20%	23 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	9%	23 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	11%	22 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	16%	22 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	18%	22 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	14%	21 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	6%	21 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	9%	21 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	20%	17 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	8%	17 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	8%	17 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	19%	16 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	22%	15 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	21%	14 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	34%	14 May →
overpass	4–13	-0.06	3%	13 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	13%	13 May →
overpass	0–6	-0.04	13%	13 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	16%	10 May →
cache	13–1	-0.01	20%	9 May →
anubis	2–13	-0.07	0%	25 Jan →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	10%	13 Jan →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	10%	11 Jan →
inferno	13–5	-0.03	18%	9 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.14	6%	8 Jan →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	9%	7 Jan →
overpass	8–13	-0.02	11%	7 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	9%	6 Jan →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	8%	5 Jan →
overpass	13–10	-0.02	17%	5 Jan →