The diabolical Danny Do-Bad

The diabolical Danny Do-Bad — CS2 Stats

ET76561198041369600[U:1:81103872]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

883Tracked matches24%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,697Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.0%42.2%42.7%2.7% short
Shot accuracy18.1%11.9%10.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.180.981.00above
Match win rate45.1%43.6%44.1%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThe diabolical Danny Do-B…FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning48
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38602Last 10038%Win rateLWLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression5.3
Utility6.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.8
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time646ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–9
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 23nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D29101934%-0.01
mirageA2314961%0.01
ancientC125742%-0.01
nukeD102820%-0.03
infernoD92722%-0.00
overpassD93633%-0.01
cache41325%0.01
anubis41325%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,114Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
2,679Matches
45.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
40.0%Headshot %
18.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 3 players
6,360MVPs
1,100Hours (in match)
3,348Bombs planted
373Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,503dust2
2,551inferno
1,331nuke
507cbble
159office
119train
105vertigo
61lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
635msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
36.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
11.60HE damage / grenade
9.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1533° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4243% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–130.0022%23 Aug
dust213–10.0613%23 Aug
cache10–130.0018%23 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0711%23 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0610%21 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0010%21 Jul
dust28–13-0.088%21 Jul
cache4–13-0.0422%21 Jul
nuke11–13-0.028%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0211%21 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0311%19 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0421%19 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0121%19 Jul
cache4–9-0.0417%18 Jul
dust210–130.0312%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0115%16 Jul
inferno15–150.0517%16 Jul
inferno12–160.0215%15 Jul
dust25–130.0119%15 Jul
dust21–13-0.0423%15 Jul
cache13–90.1325%14 Jul
inferno13–70.0618%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.049%29 Jun
anubis9–13-0.043%29 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0419%28 Jun
dust28–130.0310%28 Jun
dust213–9-0.0712%27 Jun
dust210–13-0.0212%27 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0116%27 Jun
dust27–130.0116%27 Jun
mirage13–60.079%26 Jun
ancient10–13-0.056%26 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0410%25 Jun
overpass13–110.0213%25 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0011%22 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0610%22 Jun
dust28–130.0122%14 Jun
dust213–9-0.0513%14 Jun
ancient4–13-0.047%14 Jun
mirage13–30.0311%14 Jun
overpass14–16-0.0116%13 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0617%12 Jun
dust29–13-0.0816%12 Jun
dust211–130.0313%7 Jun
dust22–13-0.0122%7 Jun
mirage13–60.0610%7 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0410%7 Jun
anubis6–130.044%3 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0810%3 Jun
overpass6–130.018%3 Jun
dust216–130.0510%2 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0611%2 Jun
dust28–13-0.016%1 Jun
mirage13–30.0624%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.0410%1 Jun
overpass13–110.0012%30 May
mirage13–2-0.0215%30 May
dust213–7-0.0329%29 May
ancient13–110.0019%29 May
overpass8–130.0117%29 May
mirage13–5-0.0121%29 May
overpass13–7-0.0017%29 May
mirage13–80.1113%29 May
mirage13–40.069%25 May
mirage13–100.0130%25 May
dust26–13-0.0116%24 May
inferno7–130.0316%24 May
nuke5–13-0.0522%22 May
nuke9–13-0.0219%22 May
mirage7–130.0117%22 May
dust213–90.0116%22 May
mirage10–130.0313%21 May
ancient13–70.1111%21 May
dust210–13-0.045%21 May
inferno11–13-0.0413%18 May
dust24–13-0.0113%17 May
mirage8–130.018%17 May
mirage8–13-0.0015%16 May
nuke9–13-0.0415%16 May
ancient16–13-0.0312%15 May
dust213–90.0017%15 May
ancient13–110.0115%13 May
inferno11–13-0.029%13 May
overpass4–130.0111%13 May
mirage13–11-0.0415%13 May
ancient8–13-0.0211%12 May
dust214–16-0.016%10 May
dust213–110.0210%9 May
nuke3–13-0.068%7 May
nuke8–13-0.0217%7 May
dust212–16-0.047%7 May
dust213–5-0.019%6 May
mirage13–10-0.0013%5 May
nuke13–10-0.0017%5 May
dust213–110.039%4 May
nuke13–10-0.0611%4 May
mirage8–13-0.0318%4 May
mirage13–50.0230%4 May
mirage2–13-0.1015%4 May
nuke7–130.0014%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →