shrekninga time

shrekninga time — CS2 Stats

76561198430952236[U:1:470686508]Steam profile ↗

1,466Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,435Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,568Purple band · top ~14.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17478 of 36773 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,568Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,568
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,432 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate56.7%44.9%46.2%above
Shot accuracy1.8%11.8%12.5%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.041.06above
Match win rate47.1%45.3%45.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshrekninga timeFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,568 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning47
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48484Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression3.8
Utility3.6
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch6.4

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.7
Utility3.6
Mechanics9.6
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time667ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 16–13
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22111150%-0.01
mirageA1811761%-0.01
anubisD124833%-0.04
infernoB126650%0.02
nukeC125742%-0.01
ancientC125742%0.02
cacheB84450%-0.03
overpass42250%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,264Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
2,259Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
56.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
1.8%Shot accuracy
5,460MVPs
796Hours (in match)
2,221Bombs planted
606Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,070dust2
2,297nuke
2,272inferno
1,173vertigo
888train
485office
37italy
22cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
50%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
88.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1861%1.5116.9
Inferno1060%1.0215.2
Dust2825%0.8615.0
Vertigo475%1.1415.3
Anubis450%1.2420.0
Ancient425%1.3016.8
Train333%1.7024.0
Nuke10%0.8916.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
93.2%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
664msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
4.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4877 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4303% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.0216%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.1212%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0612%14 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0121%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0916%13 Aug
cache13–40.0626%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0515%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0314%8 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0424%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0412%7 Aug
dust213–40.0423%7 Aug
nuke7–13-0.018%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0127%3 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0013%3 Aug
dust213–80.0225%3 Aug
ancient9–130.048%31 Jul
anubis2–6-0.1025%31 Jul
dust25–13-0.0317%31 Jul
cache13–11-0.0621%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0410%29 Jul
cache0–13-0.0633%28 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0221%27 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0325%27 Jul
cache13–100.0425%7 Jul
dust27–130.0223%7 Jul
overpass13–100.0521%4 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0311%4 Jul
dust26–13-0.0423%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0713%4 Jul
inferno10–130.0020%3 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0018%14 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0030%13 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0410%13 Jun
mirage6–130.0427%21 May
inferno7–13-0.0719%21 May
inferno13–10.1118%21 May
dust213–10-0.0218%20 May
dust213–11-0.0320%18 May
ancient13–30.0619%18 May
anubis9–13-0.0031%18 May
inferno16–130.1316%16 May
inferno13–70.0422%7 May
anubis13–7-0.0620%7 May
cache10–13-0.0714%6 May
dust29–130.0319%30 Apr
cache13–8-0.0722%30 Apr
cache12–120.0116%30 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0114%24 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0217%23 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0220%23 Apr
overpass10–130.0215%18 Apr
ancient9–130.0313%2 Apr
dust27–13-0.0222%1 Apr
mirage10–130.0319%30 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0525%25 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0011%25 Mar
ancient10–130.0314%25 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0420%24 Mar
dust213–80.0215%24 Mar
inferno14–160.0119%24 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0814%24 Mar
nuke5–13-0.130%24 Mar
dust215–15-0.0123%24 Mar
ancient13–10.0622%24 Mar
mirage8–130.0426%24 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0619%23 Mar
dust24–13-0.0611%23 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0123%23 Mar
ancient13–30.0439%21 Mar
dust213–80.0315%21 Mar
inferno13–100.0323%21 Mar
dust210–13-0.0319%21 Mar
anubis1–13-0.0733%21 Mar
nuke9–130.0822%21 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0430%18 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0217%17 Mar
anubis13–20.0721%17 Mar
dust213–60.0330%17 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0328%17 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0419%11 Mar
dust24–0-0.0729%11 Mar
dust213–10-0.0117%11 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0218%5 Mar
mirage13–40.0718%2 Mar
ancient11–130.0332%1 Mar
mirage13–60.0121%1 Mar
ancient13–70.0527%1 Mar
dust213–10-0.0116%25 Feb
overpass13–16-0.0616%25 Feb
dust213–00.0610%25 Feb
nuke13–100.0214%25 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0215%25 Feb
ancient13–110.0621%24 Feb
mirage13–60.0324%24 Feb
dust210–13-0.0120%24 Feb
nuke10–130.0321%23 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0019%23 Feb
inferno13–50.0122%23 Feb
dust29–130.0318%23 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0421%22 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →