Dizzy — CS2 Stats

76561198419765108[U:1:459499380]✓ No bans

844Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,202Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,090Pink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5793 of 14983 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,395 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDizzyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,395 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,090 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55441Last 10055%Win rateWLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression7.7
Utility4.8
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time557ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–0
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15dust2Weakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS1812667%0.04
infernoB178947%0.04
dust2D1751229%-0.01
ancientS1511473%0.04
cacheB158753%0.03
nukeA127558%0.03
anubisA53260%0.03
office110100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,473Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
2,784Matches
43.0%Match win rate
39.3%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
7,028MVPs
1,236Hours (in match)
3,087Bombs planted
852Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,615inferno
4,022nuke
3,674dust2
383train
179office
80lake
71vertigo
50cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

222Matches
50%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
81.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6946%1.2416.6
Dust25250%1.1417.2
Inferno4255%1.2017.9
Nuke2162%1.2517.7
Ancient1850%1.2218.4
Anubis944%1.1415.2
Overpass633%1.2017.0
Cache367%1.0914.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
547msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
6.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4619 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.995% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.0924%27 Aug
inferno14–160.0223%27 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0411%26 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0019%26 Aug
nuke13–50.0023%26 Aug
cache13–70.0026%26 Aug
cache13–80.0419%26 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0016%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0823%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0215%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0011%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0822%14 Aug
office13–60.1319%14 Aug
cache13–100.1322%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0513%14 Aug
mirage13–100.1218%14 Aug
anubis8–130.0316%14 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0029%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0821%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0911%12 Aug
ancient13–40.0218%12 Aug
cache13–11-0.0121%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0424%11 Aug
dust213–90.0118%10 Aug
ancient13–40.0829%10 Aug
nuke7–130.0328%9 Aug
mirage12–50.0920%9 Aug
cache3–130.0317%9 Aug
dust26–130.1224%9 Aug
inferno7–130.0215%9 Aug
dust211–130.0222%9 Aug
inferno13–40.1024%8 Aug
ancient13–9-0.018%8 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0016%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0321%8 Aug
inferno9–00.2114%8 Aug
ancient13–50.0619%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0919%8 Aug
dust23–13-0.1012%8 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0518%7 Aug
anubis13–90.0119%7 Aug
mirage16–140.0820%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0213%5 Aug
dust211–20.089%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0413%5 Aug
inferno16–130.0010%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0814%4 Aug
dust26–130.0217%4 Aug
ancient13–30.1016%4 Aug
inferno6–130.0415%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0513%3 Aug
cache13–80.1024%1 Aug
mirage13–100.1121%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0115%1 Aug
nuke13–80.043%1 Aug
inferno13–70.0828%1 Aug
anubis16–140.0611%27 Jul
nuke13–10.1117%27 Jul
cache5–130.0223%26 Jul
inferno13–110.0217%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0521%25 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0232%25 Jul
cache13–100.0419%25 Jul
ancient4–130.0114%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0421%25 Jul
inferno6–130.0325%23 Jul
nuke9–130.0815%22 Jul
mirage16–140.0215%22 Jul
ancient13–50.0614%21 Jul
dust28–13-0.0216%21 Jul
inferno8–130.0417%20 Jul
dust29–130.0019%20 Jul
cache3–13-0.0016%20 Jul
dust213–80.0521%20 Jul
ancient13–160.1120%20 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0212%19 Jul
dust21–13-0.030%18 Jul
dust216–140.0323%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0315%17 Jul
cache11–13-0.0424%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0116%13 Jul
mirage3–130.0612%13 Jul
ancient13–90.0113%13 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0410%12 Jul
dust20–13-0.0725%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0810%12 Jul
nuke13–80.0817%11 Jul
mirage13–20.0514%11 Jul
dust213–40.0617%11 Jul
cache15–150.0222%11 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0215%8 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0727%6 Jul
nuke13–60.0123%6 Jul
dust24–13-0.0913%6 Jul
cache1–13-0.0329%6 Jul
cache9–130.1723%5 Jul
inferno2–130.0415%5 Jul
cache8–10.0837%5 Jul
mirage8–20.0614%5 Jul
cache13–10-0.0516%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →