SCWARE — CS2 Stats

76561198389795308[U:1:429529580]

434Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,086Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,449Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4194 of 24330 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	37.1%	44.2%	44.9%	7.8% short
Shot accuracy	14.2%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.06	1.04	1.04	meets
Match win rate	48.8%	45.3%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning52

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7

Aggression6.3

Utility3.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.2

Utility3.9

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time555ms−44ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms

Headshot accuracy21.5%−3.6%

first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 13–1

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 5nukeWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	30	14–16	47%	0.00
cache	A	20	11–9	55%	0.03
ancient	A	15	9–6	60%	0.00
inferno	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.02
dust2	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
nuke	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.00
anubis	S	5	5–0	100%	0.06
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,427Lifetime kills

1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players

1,404Matches

48.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players

37.1%Headshot %

14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

2,903MVPs

521Hours (in match)

1,383Bombs planted

315Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-476,987

AWP3,806

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,218

P2000 / USP-S1,515

Desert Eagle832

Glock-18716

SG 553710

P90664

SCAR-20601

G3SG1395

Lifetime map wins

1,953dust2

1,211inferno

684nuke

356train

226lake

225vertigo

145cbble

143office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches

73%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

90.3ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	1	100%	0.88	14.0
Mirage	1	100%	2.00	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.2%Spray accuracy

91.3%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

543msReaction time

25.6%T opening success

46.6%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

6.3%Flash assists

5.59HE damage / grenade

6.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4666 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.5996% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	0–10	-0.03	29%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	32%	26 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	10%	25 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	18%	22 Aug →
office	9–13	0.01	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.09	15%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–3	-0.01	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.07	3%	15 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.11	9%	15 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.06	50%	12 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	31%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.06	28%	9 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	15%	9 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	40%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	10%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	13%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	13%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	21%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	17%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.04	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	30%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	26%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	30%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	14%	1 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	8%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	50%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.03	23%	30 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.11	22%	30 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	23%	29 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.08	22%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	12%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	15%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.02	16%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	23%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.08	50%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	17%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.00	38%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.05	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	23%	24 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.03	19%	24 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	14%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	0%	22 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	28%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	22%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	10%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	10%	20 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.03	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	13%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	26%	18 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	12%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.07	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	26%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	14%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	23%	18 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.19	37%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.05	25%	16 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.02	25%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	19%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	25%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	26%	13 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	25%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	16%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.10	23%	10 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	19%	10 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.07	38%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	19%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.09	24%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.02	26%	6 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	13%	5 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.01	28%	5 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.12	28%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	21%	1 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.12	25%	1 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	36%	1 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	31%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.04	22%	30 Jun →
ancient	11–0	-0.01	86%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	27%	30 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	21%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.05	8%	30 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.11	24%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	16%	28 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	31%	28 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	23%	28 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.03	25%	26 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	18%	26 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.01	20%	24 Jun →