Why No

Why No — CS2 Stats

76561198349465723[U:1:389199995]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

213Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
256Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,742Purple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3222 of 6818 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate38.3%48.1%9.8% short
Shot accuracy18.7%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.361.08above
Match win rate54.1%46.5%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWhy NoPREMIER19,742 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning46
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5842Last 10058%Win rateWLLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression5.5
Utility6.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time619ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28181064%0.02
dust2A24141058%0.01
infernoA2011955%0.02
ancientA127558%-0.00
anubisD61517%0.01
nukeS54180%0.01
train32167%0.05
overpass21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,618Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 10% of tracked players
603Matches
54.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of tracked players
38.3%Headshot %
18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
2,046MVPs
256Hours (in match)
609Bombs planted
145Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,418dust2
1,268inferno
378vertigo
353train
277nuke
177cbble
63office
10lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
623msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
12.79HE damage / grenade
10.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.0484% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0314%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.029%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0114%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0415%16 Aug
dust20–4-0.0825%2 Aug
nuke13–4-0.030%2 Aug
dust213–20.0530%2 Aug
ancient10–10-0.0220%2 Aug
mirage13–60.0914%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0816%15 Jul
nuke13–0-0.0233%15 Jul
mirage13–10.1523%14 Jul
dust24–13-0.0914%14 Jul
dust216–130.0415%13 Jul
inferno13–40.066%13 Jul
dust26–130.1214%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.068%13 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0013%17 Jun
dust25–13-0.0514%16 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0122%15 Jun
inferno3–7-0.0032%15 Jun
inferno13–40.0414%6 Apr
inferno13–110.0616%30 Mar
dust213–10-0.0414%29 Mar
mirage13–40.1012%29 Mar
mirage12–160.0215%23 Mar
mirage13–30.0921%17 Mar
dust213–10-0.0012%24 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0216%18 Feb
dust213–50.0220%18 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0833%18 Feb
dust213–6-0.0031%15 Feb
mirage5–13-0.015%15 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0212%15 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0617%15 Feb
dust211–13-0.018%15 Feb
dust213–50.0317%15 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0216%15 Feb
dust28–13-0.0110%15 Feb
dust25–13-0.026%14 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0313%10 Feb
dust213–11-0.0221%7 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0216%1 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0418%1 Feb
dust22–130.0226%18 Jan
dust213–100.0716%18 Jan
ancient13–30.0612%1 Jan
dust213–80.0412%24 Dec
dust213–00.159%24 Dec
nuke13–110.018%24 Dec
mirage11–13-0.077%24 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0017%22 Nov
train13–30.079%22 Nov
mirage13–50.1117%18 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0316%18 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0215%18 Nov
mirage13–40.0315%18 Nov
inferno11–13-0.026%15 Nov
mirage13–50.1314%15 Nov
overpass2–110.018%14 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0411%3 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0211%20 Jul
mirage16–130.0220%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0211%11 Jul
anubis4–130.0310%11 Jul
inferno13–90.0313%1 Jul
ancient5–130.0013%1 Jul
inferno13–50.029%1 Jul
inferno14–160.038%16 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0118%16 Jun
dust213–3-0.0027%16 Jun
train13–100.058%16 Jun
inferno14–160.0921%16 Jun
nuke9–130.028%16 Jun
ancient7–13-0.059%16 Jun
anubis7–130.0313%23 May
ancient13–2-0.0825%23 May
mirage13–0-0.0213%23 May
nuke13–60.0614%23 May
inferno13–5-0.0015%22 May
inferno13–50.0212%15 May
inferno13–100.058%15 May
dust28–13-0.0415%15 May
inferno9–130.0326%12 May
dust22–13-0.0012%12 May
mirage13–60.0430%12 May
train7–130.0210%29 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0010%29 Mar
dust213–70.0818%15 Mar
anubis8–13-0.009%12 Mar
mirage13–50.0313%12 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0222%12 Mar
inferno6–130.0820%10 Mar
ancient13–70.0213%8 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0221%8 Mar
inferno4–130.0111%8 Mar
dust213–9-0.0310%7 Mar
inferno13–40.1111%6 Mar
mirage13–90.065%5 Mar
ancient13–30.1315%5 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →