Jerry — CS2 Stats

76561198301082137[U:1:340816409]✓ No bans

482Tracked matches39%Win rate2021Tracked since
672Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidClutch Specialist
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning52
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52453Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim8.0
Aggression4.9
Utility3.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch10.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.2
Utility3.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time639ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.36Best rating — sanctum 9–2
131Biggest win — office
8Longest win streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA36221461%0.02
mirageD1841422%-0.01
nukeA117464%-0.00
infernoA95456%-0.00
poseidonD72529%0.01
dust2D51420%-0.01
ancient440100%0.02
office42250%0.06
anubis32167%0.00
overpass220100%-0.01
sanctum110100%0.36

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,935Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,358Matches
38.5%Match win rate
36.3%Headshot %
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
4,880MVPs
672Hours (in match)
2,322Bombs planted
410Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,972nuke
1,660inferno
1,325dust2
1,131train
824vertigo
538cbble
123office
60lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
67%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
90.4ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

80%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%1.0019.0
Anubis1100%2.3328.0
Overpass1100%1.5517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
637msReaction time
18.8%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
7.25HE damage / grenade
3.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4274 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.818% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0715%10 Aug
cache13–50.0126%10 Aug
dust210–130.0315%15 Jul
ancient13–70.0926%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0744%15 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0326%14 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0915%14 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0514%11 Jul
cache16–13-0.0537%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.039%9 Jul
nuke13–110.0132%9 Jul
mirage6–130.0332%8 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0440%8 Jul
mirage12–120.0431%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.0222%8 Jul
inferno9–70.0221%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.0021%6 Jul
cache13–90.0731%6 Jul
office9–13-0.0422%6 Jul
office7–130.0717%5 Jul
cache12–120.1038%4 Jul
cache1–13-0.0038%4 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0413%18 Jun
office13–40.0833%12 Jun
cache13–80.0227%12 Jun
cache13–50.0639%12 Jun
ancient16–140.0417%11 Jun
cache11–130.0220%11 Jun
cache6–13-0.0220%11 Jun
cache3–3-0.046%8 Jun
cache13–80.0326%8 Jun
cache7–130.0220%8 Jun
cache12–12-0.0311%8 Jun
cache13–100.0322%5 Jun
cache13–80.0527%5 Jun
cache13–11-0.0323%5 Jun
inferno11–50.0235%1 Jun
cache13–40.1032%1 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0418%30 May
nuke9–30.078%30 May
poseidon6–90.0015%30 May
cache9–13-0.0543%30 May
cache7–130.0040%30 May
mirage10–13-0.0015%30 May
nuke8–13-0.0320%28 May
mirage7–130.0313%28 May
cache13–11-0.028%28 May
mirage5–130.0022%23 May
nuke11–130.0727%23 May
cache13–40.0118%22 May
mirage3–13-0.0010%22 May
mirage4–13-0.0415%22 May
cache13–50.1421%22 May
cache13–7-0.0124%22 May
dust214–16-0.0423%20 May
cache9–13-0.0814%20 May
mirage13–110.0837%19 May
cache13–110.1230%19 May
cache13–90.0214%18 May
inferno16–13-0.0114%17 May
overpass13–6-0.0313%17 May
cache13–70.0213%17 May
cache13–8-0.0029%16 May
nuke13–100.0514%15 May
cache4–13-0.0316%15 May
cache13–80.0935%14 May
cache1–13-0.0119%14 May
cache13–8-0.038%10 May
cache11–50.0525%10 May
cache13–6-0.0114%3 May
inferno4–9-0.0318%22 Apr
anubis6–13-0.018%21 Apr
mirage13–110.0010%21 Apr
poseidon6–90.0922%21 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0118%19 Apr
anubis13–8-0.005%19 Apr
office13–10.1230%17 Apr
poseidon2–9-0.0616%11 Apr
nuke9–1-0.0420%22 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0214%21 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0317%21 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0515%21 Mar
inferno9–00.1714%7 Mar
poseidon4–9-0.1630%5 Mar
mirage0–6-0.0660%3 Mar
poseidon9–10.2135%3 Mar
ancient13–3-0.045%2 Mar
poseidon5–9-0.0129%2 Mar
nuke7–13-0.115%1 Mar
anubis13–110.0217%1 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0221%1 Mar
sanctum9–20.3615%1 Mar
mirage1–13-0.076%18 Feb
poseidon9–4-0.0426%18 Feb
nuke9–70.0710%16 Feb
dust26–13-0.0518%14 Feb
mirage13–100.0424%13 Feb
overpass13–70.0220%13 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0327%13 Feb
dust29–10.0632%13 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →