xXmilhousegamingXx — CS2 Stats
US76561198294553808[U:1:334288080]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating
Player DNA
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 665ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 2.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 49 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ancient | C | 16 | 7–9 | 44% | -0.05 |
 inferno | C | 8 | 3–5 | 38% | -0.04 |
 dust2 | D | 7 | 2–5 | 29% | -0.05 |
 nuke | A | 7 | 4–3 | 57% | -0.03 |
 mirage | — | 4 | 0–4 | 0% | -0.05 |
 cache | — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | -0.05 |
 anubis | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.05 |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
Across the last 49 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Best CS2 CrosshairAim Training →
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.8752% — below the 15% mark we flag
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4576 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 15.9992% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 13–5 | -0.01 | 14% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | -0.07 | 11% | 10 Aug → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | -0.03 | 9% | 9 Aug → | |
| inferno | 6–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 9 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 0–7 | -0.11 | 10% | 8 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.07 | 11% | 8 Aug → | |
| ancient | 6–5 | -0.04 | 12% | 8 Aug → | |
| inferno | 3–13 | -0.07 | 8% | 7 Aug → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | -0.04 | 10% | 7 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–6 | -0.01 | 11% | 7 Aug → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.04 | 8% | 7 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.04 | 0% | 7 Aug → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 6 Aug → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.03 | 6% | 6 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | -0.05 | 21% | 5 Aug → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 4 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 4 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.04 | 20% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.09 | 23% | 3 Aug → | |
| ancient | 4–13 | -0.01 | 5% | 3 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 1–13 | -0.08 | 14% | 2 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 6–8 | -0.07 | 14% | 2 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.01 | 12% | 2 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.02 | 21% | 2 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | -0.00 | 8% | 2 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–7 | -0.08 | 4% | 2 Aug → | |
| ancient | 9–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 1 Aug → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | 0.00 | 11% | 30 Jul → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.04 | 6% | 28 Jul → | |
| office | 13–10 | -0.03 | 7% | 28 Jul → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.07 | 22% | 27 Jul → | |
| inferno | 13–1 | 0.02 | 27% | 27 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–2 | -0.10 | 14% | 26 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | -0.07 | 10% | 26 Jul → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | -0.00 | 19% | 26 Jul → | |
| inferno | 13–4 | -0.07 | 7% | 25 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | -0.03 | 5% | 24 Jul → | |
| nuke | 5–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 22 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | -0.01 | 5% | 21 Jul → | |
| cache | 2–13 | -0.04 | 9% | 18 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–9 | -0.05 | 8% | 18 Jul → | |
| cache | 1–13 | -0.07 | 0% | 18 Jul → | |
| ancient | 4–1 | 0.02 | 0% | 18 Jul → | |
| ancient | 1–13 | -0.10 | 0% | 16 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | -0.10 | 14% | 16 Jul → | |
| ancient | 6–13 | -0.13 | 0% | 16 Jul → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 16 Jul → | |
| ancient | 7–13 | -0.10 | 14% | 16 Jul → | |
| anubis | 4–13 | -0.07 | 14% | 16 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.
