Perplex — CS2 Stats
76561198292790168[U:1:332524440]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 7 median | Level 8 median | vs Level 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 43.5% | 46.2% | 47.2% | 3.7% short |
| Shot accuracy | 12.3% | 12.5% | 12.3% | meets |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.07 | meets |
| Match win rate | 51.2% | 45.9% | 46.3% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Effective flashesLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | 26 | 17–9 | 65% | -0.00 | |
| D | 19 | 6–13 | 32% | -0.02 | |
| C | 18 | 8–10 | 44% | -0.03 | |
| B | 13 | 6–7 | 46% | -0.03 | |
| D | 9 | 3–6 | 33% | -0.01 | |
| C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | 0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | -0.02 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.00 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 134 | 50% | 1.12 | 15.7 |
| Inferno | 103 | 50% | 1.09 | 15.5 |
| Dust2 | 95 | 40% | 0.90 | 14.2 |
| Ancient | 63 | 44% | 0.93 | 14.3 |
| Anubis | 60 | 50% | 0.97 | 15.0 |
| Nuke | 19 | 58% | 1.25 | 20.4 |
| Vertigo | 15 | 73% | 1.13 | 17.0 |
| Overpass | 6 | 33% | 1.65 | 18.7 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 44% | 30 May → | ||
| 1–10 | -0.07 | 18% | 30 May → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.09 | 26% | 30 May → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 16% | 22 May → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.02 | 23% | 22 May → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.00 | 39% | 20 May → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 22% | 20 May → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 16% | 19 May → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.06 | 32% | 17 May → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 24% | 17 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.06 | 12% | 16 May → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.00 | 31% | 16 May → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 18% | 16 May → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.07 | 21% | 15 May → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.09 | 21% | 15 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 19% | 14 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 13 May → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.01 | 24% | 10 May → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 9 May → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.08 | 31% | 9 May → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.09 | 23% | 9 May → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.06 | 25% | 9 May → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 23% | 9 May → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.01 | 23% | 9 May → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.08 | 40% | 9 May → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 19% | 9 May → | ||
| 10–2 | 0.02 | 6% | 7 May → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 25% | 6 May → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 6 May → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 17% | 6 May → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 16% | 5 May → | ||
| 0–4 | -0.02 | 67% | 5 May → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.08 | 37% | 3 May → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.03 | 16% | 2 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 2 May → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 24% | 2 May → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.12 | 47% | 2 May → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.03 | 8% | 1 May → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 28% | 1 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 23% | 1 May → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.06 | 24% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.00 | 27% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.01 | 38% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.01 | 13% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.00 | 38% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.08 | 15% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 14% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.00 | 19% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.01 | 22% | 23 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 22 Apr → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.11 | 29% | 20 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.07 | 15% | 8 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 14% | 4 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 2 Apr → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 1 Apr → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.08 | 25% | 30 Mar → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.04 | 10% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 13% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.06 | 10% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.04 | 7% | 28 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.02 | 17% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.08 | 5% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.00 | 11% | 27 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 26 Mar → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.06 | 5% | 26 Mar → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 23 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 25% | 22 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.10 | 19% | 22 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.08 | 9% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.08 | 21% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.01 | 3% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.12 | 18% | 21 Mar → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.00 | 12% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.00 | 17% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 0% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 9% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 25–21 | -0.04 | 10% | 20 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 18% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 15% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.06 | 25% | 18 Mar → | ||
| 11–10 | -0.05 | 7% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 12% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 17% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.07 | 18% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 11% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 22% | 17 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.04 | 21% | 16 Mar → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 14 Mar → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.05 | 9% | 13 Mar → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 23% | 13 Mar → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.01 | 16% | 6 Mar → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.16 | 38% | 6 Mar → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.09 | 17% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 28% | 1 Mar → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.00 | 21% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.08 | 14% | 27 Feb → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 20% | 26 Feb → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 43% | 26 Feb → |
Match data via Leetify.