FlickSixx — CS2 Stats

76561198977184358[U:1:1016918630]✓ No bans

2,449Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,980Purple band · top ~20.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9983 of 17150 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFlickSixxPREMIER16,980 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning56
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateLLLLTLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression6.4
Utility5.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time618ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–8
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
19In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 23nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2315865%0.00
dust2D2371630%-0.02
mirageB179853%-0.02
ancientC125742%-0.01
anubisB115645%-0.01
nukeD61517%-0.01
cacheC52340%-0.04
overpass32167%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,126Matches
47%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
74.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno17558%0.9513.9
Mirage17244%0.9214.1
Dust214147%0.9214.2
Anubis13537%0.8714.6
Ancient8743%0.8813.8
Vertigo7348%0.8413.8
Nuke4560%0.8713.3
Overpass3047%0.9114.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
615msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
12.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.409% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–130.0325%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0221%23 Aug
cache3–13-0.0712%22 Aug
inferno10–130.0013%20 Aug
dust215–150.0628%17 Aug
ancient9–130.0116%17 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0438%16 Aug
mirage0–13-0.079%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0320%15 Aug
inferno3–13-0.079%9 Aug
inferno13–10-0.019%9 Aug
inferno9–130.0716%9 Aug
dust27–130.0013%5 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0719%4 Aug
dust214–16-0.0622%3 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0411%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0322%3 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0416%3 Aug
cache13–11-0.0218%2 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0214%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0922%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0518%2 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0412%1 Aug
inferno13–70.0112%29 Jul
ancient13–6-0.022%27 Jul
inferno16–12-0.027%26 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0513%26 Jul
nuke10–130.0124%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0013%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0616%23 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0216%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0513%23 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0410%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.0112%13 Jul
inferno4–13-0.027%2 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0619%1 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0121%1 Jul
inferno13–90.0319%29 Jun
inferno16–19-0.0619%23 Jun
overpass10–13-0.007%22 Jun
dust24–13-0.0821%22 Jun
inferno13–60.0913%20 Jun
dust213–100.0723%20 Jun
dust22–13-0.0615%20 Jun
mirage9–130.0410%20 Jun
mirage13–60.0313%18 Jun
mirage13–0-0.0625%14 Jun
ancient13–70.0314%13 Jun
dust29–13-0.0514%13 Jun
ancient13–80.1413%10 Jun
dust213–100.0316%6 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0220%1 Jun
mirage7–130.0010%1 Jun
inferno13–80.0111%1 Jun
dust213–8-0.0210%1 Jun
anubis13–100.0014%26 May
anubis13–8-0.0129%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0312%24 May
dust213–10-0.0317%23 May
nuke9–13-0.0032%22 May
dust213–9-0.047%21 May
inferno13–8-0.0311%19 May
inferno17–190.0427%18 May
dust213–90.0226%17 May
ancient5–13-0.0517%9 May
overpass13–90.0811%8 May
inferno13–90.1417%8 May
inferno13–8-0.0722%8 May
mirage5–13-0.0419%5 May
mirage13–40.0715%3 May
cache13–5-0.0021%1 May
cache14–16-0.0314%29 Apr
dust213–160.0420%29 Apr
cache2–13-0.0643%28 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0214%27 Apr
inferno13–100.029%25 Apr
anubis16–190.0116%23 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0715%20 Apr
dust213–90.0317%17 Apr
mirage13–10-0.074%15 Apr
dust26–13-0.0325%15 Apr
inferno9–130.0012%15 Apr
dust210–13-0.0418%14 Apr
overpass13–90.0614%13 Apr
dust211–13-0.0312%12 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0515%12 Apr
dust214–16-0.0213%12 Apr
anubis13–60.109%11 Apr
anubis13–9-0.038%8 Apr
dust25–13-0.087%5 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0322%4 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0320%4 Apr
anubis13–30.0319%4 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0319%4 Apr
inferno9–13-0.057%3 Apr
dust23–13-0.0419%1 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0410%1 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0023%31 Mar
dust23–130.0121%30 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0220%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →