DuelMond — CS2 Stats

US76561198069048964[U:1:108783236]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,352Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,541Hours in CS61Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,763Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1120 of 5246 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,657 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	56.0%	52.8%	above
Shot accuracy	23.5%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.82	1.08	0.26 short
Match win rate	63.6%	49.2%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning62

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWWWTLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2

Aggression8.9

Utility4.2

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning6.2

Utility4.2

Mechanics9.3

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time526ms−72ms

first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms

Headshot accuracy19.3%−2.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–2Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

W4Current streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	-0.00
dust2	B	23	12–11	52%	0.00
inferno	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
cache	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
anubis	C	11	4–7	36%	0.00
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

328,910Lifetime kills

0.82K/D

13,840Matches

63.6%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band

56.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Pink band

23.5%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Pink band

23,105MVPs

6,892Hours (in match)

11,188Bombs planted

3,176Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47171,423

M4A4 / M4A1-S53,448

P2000 / USP-S22,966

AWP19,084

Glock-1810,231

Desert Eagle9,373

P2503,855

MP93,468

FAMAS3,400

MAC-103,204

Lifetime map wins

16,097dust2

11,043inferno

4,403train

4,301cbble

3,077nuke

1,693vertigo

468lake

350office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

871Matches

53%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

81.8ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	79	56%	1.07	16.1
Dust2	70	43%	1.16	17.0
Anubis	39	46%	1.08	16.8
Inferno	32	66%	1.07	16.8
Cache	29	59%	1.24	19.2
Ancient	18	44%	0.96	13.4
Nuke	7	57%	1.07	15.4
Vertigo	4	75%	0.98	16.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy

41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.0%Spray accuracy

91.9%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

535msReaction time

33.6%T opening success

56.0%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

9.23HE damage / grenade

6.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4313 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.6335% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–10	0.00	18%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.06	23%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.00	10%	24 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	23%	24 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	18%	22 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	14%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	18%	22 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	21%	21 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	20%	21 Aug →
vertigo	5–9	0.00	22%	21 Aug →
inferno	7–9	-0.08	19%	21 Aug →
inferno	9–1	0.27	11%	21 Aug →
inferno	9–0	0.04	31%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	15%	21 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.03	38%	21 Aug →
vertigo	5–9	-0.01	43%	21 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.06	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	6%	19 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.00	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	12%	17 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	23%	17 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.10	20%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	24%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	20%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	15%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	13%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	14%	15 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	22%	14 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	11%	13 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–0	0.02	33%	13 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.00	27%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	28%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	23%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	27%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.08	21%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	6%	5 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.05	7%	4 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	17%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	13%	3 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.08	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	22%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	11%	2 Aug →
mirage	5–2	-0.03	30%	2 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	30%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	12%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	10%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	16%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	26%	2 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	11%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	28%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	28%	30 Jul →
train	13–10	-0.03	21%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	23%	30 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	9%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	27%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	28%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.03	19%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.13	37%	29 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	13%	29 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	50%	28 Jul →
cache	24–28	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	11%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	26%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	29%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	10%	15 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	3%	11 Jul →
cache	4–9	0.05	30%	10 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.06	27%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	15%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	31%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.11	21%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	22%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.02	21%	3 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.00	18%	3 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	27%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	20%	3 Jul →
anubis	2–13	0.00	22%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.14	30%	3 Jul →
overpass	4–13	0.00	17%	3 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	30%	1 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	13%	30 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	16%	29 Jun →